2019
DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2019.1684659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboriginal historical archaeological site, Kanyanyapilla camp, McLaren Vale, South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While physical traces of Aboriginal pre-colonial presence have progressively disappeared, there is sufficient living Aboriginal knowledge as well as documentation to retrace regime shifts in the landscape after the establishment of the first Europeans. Aboriginal people were employed on farms in the region from the 1830s and there is evidence of campsites persisting independent of colonial settlements (Liebelt, 2016; Walshe et al , 2019). Analysis of toponyms in the region also highlights an extensive presence of Aboriginal land uses (Amery and Williams, 2002) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Results – Landscape Regime Shifts and The Biocultural Landsc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While physical traces of Aboriginal pre-colonial presence have progressively disappeared, there is sufficient living Aboriginal knowledge as well as documentation to retrace regime shifts in the landscape after the establishment of the first Europeans. Aboriginal people were employed on farms in the region from the 1830s and there is evidence of campsites persisting independent of colonial settlements (Liebelt, 2016; Walshe et al , 2019). Analysis of toponyms in the region also highlights an extensive presence of Aboriginal land uses (Amery and Williams, 2002) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Results – Landscape Regime Shifts and The Biocultural Landsc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous historical and ethnohistorical accounts make it clear that Indigenous peoples across Australia were quick to recognize the potential of glass for making a range of artifacts, including spear points (e.g., Backhouse 1843: 103, 433, 517;Balfour 1903;Bolam 1925: 82;Carnegie 1898;Carter 1798;de Winton 1898: 105-106;Idriess 1937: 59-62;Terry 1925: 264), adzes and other scrapers (e.g., Dawson 1831Dawson : 67, 135, 1935Eden 1874: 54-55;Roth 1899: 69), knives used to incise either human or animal flesh (e.g., Cawthorne 1844: 69; Noble 1879: 64) and razors for shaving (e.g., Gould et al 1971: 165;Wilkins 1928: 24). Although flaked or otherwise utilized glass artifacts are relatively commonly reported in the archaeological literature, they typically occur in small numbers, including often singly, and are rarely subjected to detailed analysis (e.g., Allen and Jones 1980;Bourke 2005;Colley 2000;Foghlú et al 2016;Goward 2011;Harrison 1996Harrison , 2000Irish and Goward 2012;McNiven 1998;Proudfoot et al 1991;Sim and Wallis 2008;Stingemore 2010;Ulm et al 1999Ulm et al , 2009Veth and O'Connor, 2005;Walshe et al 2019;Williamson 2002). There are, however, several notable exceptions.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Flaked Glass In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%