Abordagem Fisioterapêutica Em Paciente Com Microcefalia Congênita Por Zika Vírus: Relato De Caso

Abstract

Elaborado por Maurício Amormino Júnior-CRB6/2422 O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores. 2019 Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.

Recommendation of Neurorehabilitation according to the Padovan-Method Neurofunctional Reorganisation® for treating neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review

“…Finally, four studies (no RCT, one pseudo-RCT [49], one non-RCT/CCT [55], one CBA [44] and one retrospective self-compared cohort study [48]) and n = 14 case documentations (10 CR [46,47,(50)(51)(52)(53)72,(164)(165)(166) and 4 CS [22,36,54,167]) remained for inclusion. Divergent from the protocol, no further exclusion was made in the case of CS or CR with unclear documentation of the therapists quali cation (therapy under supervision [52,53,72] or NI [50,51,54,[164][165][166]). A owchart following the PRISMA guidelines [168] was created to illustrate the process and is shown in Fig.…”

“…Nine of the cases were collected in Brazil [22, 47, 50-54, 72, 167], three in Germany [36,165,166], one in Great Britain [46] and one did not provide any information about the country [164]. The context of the cases were university [51][52][53]72], inpatients [22,46,47,54] and ambulatory setting [36,165,166] (no information provided [50,164,167]). The number of participants ranged from n = 1 to n = 11 [22] and was n = 40 in total.…”

“…Study drop-outs (n = 5) were reported in one case series due to lack of time to adhere to the therapy protocol [36]. The therapists were either certi ed for the Padovan-Method® [22,36,46,47,167], under supervision [52,53,72] or had no information provided [50,51,54,[164][165][166].…”

“…Statistically signi cant outcomes are listed separately (see Table 2). To extract the early response from acute phase treatment, response the length of intervention was used (cut-of duration of treatment process ≤ 1 month [22,47,48,55,167] and ≤ 3 months for acute phase treatment [22,[49][50][51][52][53]167], > 3 months for longterm response [36,46,47,54,72,164,165]). As some of the included trails or reports extended over a long period, by derogation from the protocol [96], the section 'follow-up response between four and six months' was extended to 'long-term and follow-up response between four and six months and more'.…”

“…Authors' judgement and support for judgement regarding Oliveira 2019 [72]. rise of the JFK CRS-R [183] x 1 rise of the WHIM [182] x Buson 2019 [52] Carmo 2019 [53] Delmondes 2018 [47] Froitzheim 2010 [164] Großweischede 2000 [165] Menezes 2019 [54] Oertel 2015 [36] Oliveira 2019 [72] Pereira 2018 [167] ( Barbosa 2019 [50] Carmo 2019 [53] Delmondes 2018 [47] Froitzheim 2010 [164] Großweischede 2000 [165] Menezes 2019 [54] Oertel 2015 [36] Oliveira 2019 [72] Pereira 2018 [167] Domain Buson 2019 [52] Delmondes 2018 [47] Froitzheim 2010 [164] Großweischede 2000 [165] Menezes 2019 [54] Oertel 2015 [36] Oliveira 2019 [72] Pereira 2015 [167] Wilson Lukowicz 2019 [44] Pereira et al 2015 [167] Buson 2019 [52] Delmondes 2018 [47] Froitzheim 2010 [164] Großweischede 2000 [165] Menezes 2019 [54] Oertel Buson 2019 [52] Delmondes 2018 [47] Froitzheim 2010 [164] Großweischede 2000 [165] Wilson 2016 [46] Notes. newb = new-born = in children; progr = progress; impr = improvement of motoric functions…”