2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2003.00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abolish C3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…zone that exists in FNAC of breast in cases where an unequivocal diagnosis cannot be made [5]. Instead, the categories of atypia probably benign (C3) and suspicious of malignancy (C4) provide a strategy for the classification of problematic or uncertain cases; this maintains the predictive value of the benign (C2) and malignant (C5) categories and allows separation of these difficult cases into clinically useful groups with differing probabilities of malignancy [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…zone that exists in FNAC of breast in cases where an unequivocal diagnosis cannot be made [5]. Instead, the categories of atypia probably benign (C3) and suspicious of malignancy (C4) provide a strategy for the classification of problematic or uncertain cases; this maintains the predictive value of the benign (C2) and malignant (C5) categories and allows separation of these difficult cases into clinically useful groups with differing probabilities of malignancy [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%