1977
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.86.5.518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness.

Abstract: Defines need for uniqueness as a positive striving for abnormality relative to other people. Recent research regarding situational determinants of uniqueness motivation is described, and a dispositional individual-differences measure of need for uniqueness is presented. The development of the Uniqueness Scale aims at insuring construct validity as a guide for the item selection. The internal reliabilities, item-remainder coefficients, test–retest reliabilities, cross-validation information, factor analysis, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
549
1
20

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(601 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
11
549
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…In Japan, his early version with 10 items (Yamaguchi, 1994) was found to correlate positively with sensitivity to rejection and affiliative tendency (Mehrabian & Ksionzky, 1974; a Japanese translation), positively with public self-consciousness but not significantly with private self-consciousness (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975; a Japanese translation), positively with self-monitoring (Snyder, 1974; a Japanese translation), and negatively with need for uniqueness (Snyder & Fromkin, 1977; a Japanese translation). His extended 14-item scale correlated positively with sensitivity to rejection and affiliative tendency and negatively with need for uniqueness in Japan, Korea, and the United States (Yamaguchi et al, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, his early version with 10 items (Yamaguchi, 1994) was found to correlate positively with sensitivity to rejection and affiliative tendency (Mehrabian & Ksionzky, 1974; a Japanese translation), positively with public self-consciousness but not significantly with private self-consciousness (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975; a Japanese translation), positively with self-monitoring (Snyder, 1974; a Japanese translation), and negatively with need for uniqueness (Snyder & Fromkin, 1977; a Japanese translation). His extended 14-item scale correlated positively with sensitivity to rejection and affiliative tendency and negatively with need for uniqueness in Japan, Korea, and the United States (Yamaguchi et al, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most well-cited drive approach in consumer behavior and psychology, the uniqueness literature (Fromkin 1970;Snyder and Fromkin 1980), contends that individuals experience a negative emotional reaction when they feel overly similar to others. Uniqueness research has focused on temporary situational pressures and stable individual differences.…”
Section: Individual Drives For Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars across the social sciences have argued that people have a drive to be different (Brewer 1991;Snyder and Fromkin 1980;see Vignoles, Chryssochoou, and Breakwell [2000] for a review). The most well-cited drive approach in consumer behavior and psychology, the uniqueness literature (Fromkin 1970;Snyder and Fromkin 1980), contends that individuals experience a negative emotional reaction when they feel overly similar to others.…”
Section: Individual Drives For Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the more unique a product or service is perceived to be and the more expensive it is compared to usual standards, the more valuable it becomes [106]. In addition, the functional value of uniqueness also strengthens the individual's need to be unique and set himself apart from the social environment within which he or she is embedded [101]. Individuals' desire for differentiation and exclusivity can only be fulfilled when the consumption and use of a certain technology or service is prevalent in a certain group [65], [108], [109].…”
Section: Social Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%