2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats

Abstract: Unilateral damage to sensorimotor cortical (SMC) regions can profoundly impair skilled reaching function in the contralesional forelimb. Such damage also results in impairments and compensatory changes in the less-affected/ipsilesional forelimb, but these effects remain poorly understood. Furthermore, anesthetization of the ipsilesional hand in humans with cerebral infarcts has been reported to produce transient functional improvements in the paretic hand [14,48]. One aim of this study was to sensitively assay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, disrupting the contralesional M1 or premotor cortex during the performance of more-complex motor tasks with the paretic hand disrupts the timing of movement with the paretic hand more so than it does in healthy controls 168 , suggesting that the contralesional hemisphere positively contributes to paretic hand function. Similarly contradictory roles of the contralesional hemisphere can be found in the animal literature 112,169171 .…”
Section: Roles Of the Contralesional Hemispherementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, disrupting the contralesional M1 or premotor cortex during the performance of more-complex motor tasks with the paretic hand disrupts the timing of movement with the paretic hand more so than it does in healthy controls 168 , suggesting that the contralesional hemisphere positively contributes to paretic hand function. Similarly contradictory roles of the contralesional hemisphere can be found in the animal literature 112,169171 .…”
Section: Roles Of the Contralesional Hemispherementioning
confidence: 67%
“…This is consistent with there being subtle, interhemispheric motor learning interference effects that become exaggerated in rats with unilateral SMC lesions while re-learning to use the impaired forelimb. In both intact humans (Ward and Cohen, 2004) and rats (O'Bryant, Bernier, and Jones, 2007;Glazewski, Benedetti, and Barth, 2007), reduction in ipsilateral sensory activity has been found to improve function in the other body side. Sensory input from ipsilateral whiskers has been shown to result in a strong constraining influence on the receptive fields in the barrel field cortex (Glazewski, Benedetti, and Barth, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory input from ipsilateral whiskers has been shown to result in a strong constraining influence on the receptive fields in the barrel field cortex (Glazewski, Benedetti, and Barth, 2007). Anesthetization of the less-affected hand improves performance of a finger tapping task with the paretic hand in stroke patients (Floel et al, 2004) and improves reaching function in the impaired forelimb in rats (O'Bryant, Bernier, and Jones, 2007). Moreover, the contralesional hemisphere can have an exaggerated inhibitory influence over the stroke-affected hemisphere during movements of the paretic hand compared with healthy subjects (Murase et al, 2004;Duque et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motor impairments are among the most common and chronic consequences of stroke 25,26 , and are therefore the focus of a number of basic science research laboratories (e.g., [27][28][29][30][31][32] ). Skilled reaching tasks are the most commonly used tests of dexterous forelimb use in rodents, and have historically been most often used in rat models of injury (e.g., 11,19,28,33 ), although their use in mouse models is becoming quite frequent 34,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%