2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0218-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal scar identification with spherical-nucleic-acid technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CTGF mRNA and TGFβRI were chosen as targets for detection and mRNA regulation, respectively. CTGF mRNA is highly expressed in HSFs and has been shown to be a suitable biomarker, while TGFβRI siRNA targets the upstream receptor TGFβRI and has been shown to be an efficient in vivo CTGF mRNA suppression…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CTGF mRNA and TGFβRI were chosen as targets for detection and mRNA regulation, respectively. CTGF mRNA is highly expressed in HSFs and has been shown to be a suitable biomarker, while TGFβRI siRNA targets the upstream receptor TGFβRI and has been shown to be an efficient in vivo CTGF mRNA suppression…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal expression of mRNA tends to precede the cutaneous features of scars and can provide a target for earlier treatment, potentially averting the permanent sequelae . Providing specific and sensitive probes, the temporal and spatial distribution of mRNA at the cellular level can be monitored in a quantitative and non‐invasive way, which would allow us to identify the abnormal fibroblasts in the skin of live mice and rabbits, and to ex vivo human skin models …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, NanoFlares have been used for numerous applications ex vivo and in vivo. For instance, Yeo et al utilized NanoFlares for abnormal scar detection . The connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) mRNA is overexpressed in incidences of hypertrophic and keloidal scars, resulting in overproduction of collagen.…”
Section: Hybridization‐based Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, involving a NanoFlare that was responsive to connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) mRNA (i.e., with fluorescence flare strands that were detachable upon mRNA hybridization, Figure A), such penetration ability was found on the skin of live mice and rabbits, as well as on ex vivo human skin (Figure B). Furthermore, fluorescence specificity facilitated correlation with the quantity of hypertrophic scar‐derived fibroblast (HSF) cells, enabling a biopsy‐free scar diagnosis and potentially allowing disease monitoring as well as gauging treatment response through longitudinal observation (Figure C) …”
Section: Nucleic‐acid‐based Sensors For Functional Gene Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of a number of works involving aptamer‐tumour targeting and inducible formulation disassembly for drug release/signal generation, our NanoFlare study is the first to report the use of a topically applied NA sensor to diagnose skin diseases through biomarker imaging. Promisingly, we showed that the probe signal from CTGF NanoFlares correlated well with the “scar elevation index”, a functional measure of abnormal scarring in a rabbit wound scarring model . Moving forward, further in situ diagnosis applications are to be expected, through clever adaptation of new or previously proposed NA sensors alongside multidisciplinary efforts from clinicians, scientists and engineers to meet and solve current limitations described above.…”
Section: Perspectives Of Na Sensors For In Situ Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%