2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal neural activities in first-episode, treatment-naïve, short-illness-duration, and treatment-response patients with major depressive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parahippocampal atrophy was found in highlethality suicide attempters (Ahearn et al, 2001;Soloff et al, 2012), and postmortem studies have suggested a reduced parahippocampal volume in suicide victims (Altshuler et al, 1990). Our results are in accord with the decreased ReHo reported in the parahippocampal gyrus of MDD patients (Guo et al, 2011;Yao et al, 2009). Dysfunctional or damaged parahippocampal circuits may disrupt limbic pathways involved in affect regulation, thereby triggering or enhancing vulnerability to mood disorders, which in combination with environmental stressors results in suicidal behavior (Ehrlich et al, 2005).…”
Section: Hippocampus and Parahippocampal Gyrussupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Parahippocampal atrophy was found in highlethality suicide attempters (Ahearn et al, 2001;Soloff et al, 2012), and postmortem studies have suggested a reduced parahippocampal volume in suicide victims (Altshuler et al, 1990). Our results are in accord with the decreased ReHo reported in the parahippocampal gyrus of MDD patients (Guo et al, 2011;Yao et al, 2009). Dysfunctional or damaged parahippocampal circuits may disrupt limbic pathways involved in affect regulation, thereby triggering or enhancing vulnerability to mood disorders, which in combination with environmental stressors results in suicidal behavior (Ehrlich et al, 2005).…”
Section: Hippocampus and Parahippocampal Gyrussupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, reliability was tested using two measures. The first employed measure was the Kendall’s rank correlation (in order to quantify the consistency in relative order (Zang et al 2004; Shehzad et al 2009; Guo et al 2011; Thomason et al 2011; Li et al 2012; Patriat et al 2013)) between the functional connectivity scores obtained at the first and second session, which quantifies the degree to which the order of observations is similar across both sessions. Modifications in the signal extraction and confound removal methods alters the residual signal fluctuations, which leads to variation in the connectivity measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an exception, coordinates from one study (Lui et al, 2011) were transformed using tal2mni (Brett et al, 2001) as final coordinates in that study had initially been transformed using this method. Coordinates were assigned to two categories based on directionality of findings in order to avoid that clearly opposed findings in the original studies enhance each other in the ALE-analysis: group A comprises findings of decreased long distance or local connectivity (including lower correlation coefficients or lower regional homogeneity) or lower power of typical low frequency fluctuations representing spontaneous neural activity in depression compared to healthy controls and findings without clearly interpretable directionality information (Greicius et al, 2007; Bluhm et al, 2009; Yao et al, 2009; Liu et al, 2010, 2013a,b; Veer et al, 2010; Zhou et al, 2010; Furman et al, 2011; Guo et al, 2011a,b, 2012a,b, 2013a,b,c; Hamilton et al, 2011; Lui et al, 2011; Peng et al, 2011, 2012; Wu et al, 2011; Ma et al, 2012, 2013; Wang et al, 2012a, 2013a,b; Ye et al, 2012; Zhu et al, 2012; Tang et al, 2013; Zeng et al, 2013). Details of these studies are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of these studies are presented in Table 1. Group B represents increased connectivity or low frequency fluctuations in depression compared to controls (Table 2) (Liu et al, 2010, 2013a,b; Sheline et al, 2010; Veer et al, 2010; Zhou et al, 2010; Furman et al, 2011; Guo et al, 2011a,b, 2012b, 2013a,b; Hamilton et al, 2011; Wu et al, 2011; Cao et al, 2012; Ma et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2012a, 2013a; Ye et al, 2012; Zhu et al, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%