2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2847744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Loan Growth, Credit Information Sharing and Systemic Risk in Asian Banks

Abstract: This paper investigates the interplay of abnormal loan growth, credit reporting system and systemic risk in banking. Based on a sample of publicly traded banks in Asia from 1998 to 2012, higher abnormal loan growth leads to higher systemic risk one year ahead. A closer investigation further suggests that better credit information coverage and private credit bureaus can stem the buildup of bank systemic risk one year ahead due to higher abnormal loan growth. Eventually, this paper offers some supports to streng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing literature allows us to understand that a high degree of dependence and contagion exists among banks within and across countries and regions during crisis periods (Paltalidis et al, 2015;Black et al, 2016;Dungey et al, 2017;Duprey et al, 2017;Mohanty et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Verma et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Zedda and Cannas, 2020). Furthermore, various determinants, such as fundamental factors, liquidity, market factors, interbank loans, and macroprudential policies, can contribute to the degree of systemic risk (Acharya and Steffen, 2013;Pais and Stock, 2013;Acemoglu et al, 2015;Battaglia and Gallo, 2017;Soedarmono et al, 2017;Varotto and Zhao, 2018;Su and Wong, 2018;Elyasiani and Jia, 2019;Yang et al, 2020;Andries et al, 2020;Bats and Houben, 2020;Brunnermeier et al, 2020;Meuleman and Vennet, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature allows us to understand that a high degree of dependence and contagion exists among banks within and across countries and regions during crisis periods (Paltalidis et al, 2015;Black et al, 2016;Dungey et al, 2017;Duprey et al, 2017;Mohanty et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Verma et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Zedda and Cannas, 2020). Furthermore, various determinants, such as fundamental factors, liquidity, market factors, interbank loans, and macroprudential policies, can contribute to the degree of systemic risk (Acharya and Steffen, 2013;Pais and Stock, 2013;Acemoglu et al, 2015;Battaglia and Gallo, 2017;Soedarmono et al, 2017;Varotto and Zhao, 2018;Su and Wong, 2018;Elyasiani and Jia, 2019;Yang et al, 2020;Andries et al, 2020;Bats and Houben, 2020;Brunnermeier et al, 2020;Meuleman and Vennet, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It refers to lenders sharing proprietary information about their loan clients either through private credit bureaus or public credit registries. The investigations into its role in credit markets have notably considered its effect on the volume of credit to the private sector (Asongu, 2017; Grajzl, and Laptieva 2016); the cost of credit (Asongu, 2017); banking crisis (Soedarmonoa, Sitorusb and Tarazic, 2017); market power (Boateng, Asongu, Akamavi an dTchamyou, 2018) and loan delinquency and defaults (Ghosh, 2019; Nakamuraa and Roszbach, 2018; Kusi Agbloyora, Ansah‐Adu and Gyeke‐Dakoa, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that domestic banks have higher efficiency than foreign banks. While examining the relationship between loan growth and systematic risk in Asian banks, Soedarmono et al (2017b) conclude that higher abnormal loan growth increases the following years' systematic risk. While studying the Islamic banks of the GCC region, Srairi (2019) finds that loan growth, bank size, deposits flow, bank efficiency, economic growth and credit information influence the banks' risk-taking.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, to examine the in-depth insights, the study uses LLP and LLR and NPL as credit risk like (Sobarsyah et al, 2020). This practice is common in conventional banking research, whereas the pieces of evidence are limited in the Islamic banking context (Sobarsyah et al, 2020;Soedarmono et al, 2017b). The study uses two The moderating role of capital measurements of loan growth (DLOAN) where one is similar to (Pramono et al, 2019;Sobarsyah et al, 2020), and lagged loan growth (LOANG) is similar to (Foos et al, 2010).…”
Section: Variables Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%