2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.630406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Habituation of the Auditory Event-Related Potential P2 Component in Patients With Schizophrenia

Abstract: Auditory event-related potentials (ERP) may serve as diagnostic tools for schizophrenia and inform on the susceptibility for this condition. Particularly, the examination of N1 and P2 components of the auditory ERP may shed light on the impairments of information processing streams in schizophrenia. However, the habituation properties (i.e., decreasing amplitude with the repeated presentation of an auditory stimulus) of these components remain poorly studied compared to other auditory ERPs. Therefore, the curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our study shows the depression within the N1 latencies (~100 ms) after tetanization, the later P2 component was enhanced—the finding also reported in previous research and thus representing a more reliable and consistent effect (Mears & Spencer, 2012; Rygvold et al, 2021; Teo et al, 2014). While studies of repetitive suppression often show a synchronous decrease in the N1 and P2 components (Lanting et al, 2013; Mazer et al, 2021; Sambeth et al, 2004), many studies show isolated changes in these components in different experimental approaches (de Boer & Krumbholz, 2018; Hsu et al, 2014), which supports the assumption that these components reflect rather independent neurophysiological processes (Crowley & Colrain, 2004). Our work is in line with this view as N1 and P2 showed opposite as well as uncorrelated changes after stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…While our study shows the depression within the N1 latencies (~100 ms) after tetanization, the later P2 component was enhanced—the finding also reported in previous research and thus representing a more reliable and consistent effect (Mears & Spencer, 2012; Rygvold et al, 2021; Teo et al, 2014). While studies of repetitive suppression often show a synchronous decrease in the N1 and P2 components (Lanting et al, 2013; Mazer et al, 2021; Sambeth et al, 2004), many studies show isolated changes in these components in different experimental approaches (de Boer & Krumbholz, 2018; Hsu et al, 2014), which supports the assumption that these components reflect rather independent neurophysiological processes (Crowley & Colrain, 2004). Our work is in line with this view as N1 and P2 showed opposite as well as uncorrelated changes after stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Abnormalities in these components have been consistently reported in SZ patients, which include reduced amplitude of the N100 as well as reduced amplitude and shorter peak latencies of the P200 ( 57 ). Moreover, both auditory ERP components have been used to examine sensory and information processing impairments in SZ ( 58 ). In light of this, our focus turned to these components, in particular their amplitude and latency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%