2018
DOI: 10.3233/jad-180603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal Functional Brain Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Minimum Spanning Tree Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…had lower values, indicating that these subjects have weaker local information processing capacity. The above results show attenuated long-distance functional connections and decreased local functional connections in the brain network of subjects with the PDE4D variants, and these network properties were very similar to those found in previous studies examining brain networks in subjects showing cognitive impairment (Bassett and Sporns, 2017;Murphy and Fox, 2017;Rathore et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2018). This supports our hypothesis that PDE4D variants can be neurotoxic and even lead to cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Abnormal Network Topologies Associated With Pde4d Variantssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…had lower values, indicating that these subjects have weaker local information processing capacity. The above results show attenuated long-distance functional connections and decreased local functional connections in the brain network of subjects with the PDE4D variants, and these network properties were very similar to those found in previous studies examining brain networks in subjects showing cognitive impairment (Bassett and Sporns, 2017;Murphy and Fox, 2017;Rathore et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2018). This supports our hypothesis that PDE4D variants can be neurotoxic and even lead to cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Abnormal Network Topologies Associated With Pde4d Variantssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Generally, the brain connectome has been directly probed by structural connectivity (SC) derived from diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI), which represents anatomical wiring diagrams, and functional connectivity (FC) derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which reflects the synchronization of neuronal activities in different brain regions (5,6). Recently, researchers have argued that the functional network connections of the human brain are limited by the potential anatomical white matter pathway (5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). The association between SC and FC, called structuralfunctional (SC-FC) coupling, and the joint study of SC and FC can describe the functional dynamics of the brain from a structural topological perspective and may detect subtle brain changes more sensitively than any single imaging modality (7,18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rfMRI) has been increasingly used as a reliable method (Zuo and Xing, 2014) to detect brain network abnormalities in aMCI (Agosta et al, 2012; Bharath et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2018b) or AD (Binnewijzend et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2018b). The rfMRI findings in AD and MCI are rather consistent across different studies in different networks, such as default mode network (Agosta et al, 2012), somatomotor network (Albers et al, 2015), dorsal attention network (Qian et al, 2015), limbic network (Nestor et al, 2003), and frontoparietal control network (Agosta et al, 2012; Brier et al, 2012; Munro et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%