2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal expansion during the ferro- to para-magnetic transition in pure iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) a contraction stage (A 2 -A 3 ) due to the a/g transformation, during which the interface is moving back into the original ferrite phase. The abnormal expansion part (marked by the red dashed rectangle) during heating in both alloys is related to the magnetic transition, which has also appeared in pure iron near the Curie temperature and is thought to be caused by a change of electronephonon interaction under the radio frequency field [33]. Moreover, as arrowed in Fig.…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ii) a contraction stage (A 2 -A 3 ) due to the a/g transformation, during which the interface is moving back into the original ferrite phase. The abnormal expansion part (marked by the red dashed rectangle) during heating in both alloys is related to the magnetic transition, which has also appeared in pure iron near the Curie temperature and is thought to be caused by a change of electronephonon interaction under the radio frequency field [33]. Moreover, as arrowed in Fig.…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As for the a/g transformation, the approximately linear dilation in the heating (B 1 -B 2 ) and in the cooling (B 3 -B 4 ) cycle can be considered as stagnant stage; for both alloys a distinctive contraction (B 2 -B 3 ) is observed after the isothermal holding at 790 C, during which the interface migrates back into the original ferrite. Again, the abnormal diameter change in both alloys during heating and cooling is deemed to be a variation of electronephonon interaction during magnetic transition [33], though the variation degree of heating is smaller than that of cooling due to the faster heating rate (5 C/s). Emphasis should be placed on the nonlinear expansion stage (B 4 -B 5 ), which is attributed to the g/a transformation.…”
Section: Interaction Between A/g Interface and Ipd Carbides During G/a Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic calculations in Figure 8 predicted the possible precipitation and dissolution of other intermetallic compounds besides Ni 3 (Ti,Al) starting from 533 • C, which might possibly superimpose to the α' → γ reversion, thus further complicating the interpretation of DSC and dilatometric curves. Another possibly involved transformation is the ferromagnetic-to-paramagnetic transition at the Curie temperature TC, which, however, should appear as a contraction on dilatometric curves [56]. Therefore, the variety of possible microstructural changes occurring within the temperature range corresponding to peak II does not enable the complete identification of all the observed peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be owing to the time needed for the incubation of austenite nuclei that would improve the Ac 1 temperatures for a higher heating rate. The deviations from linear expansion during heating before Ac 1 were caused by the switching of the heating rate and the magnetic transition [ 35 ]. Figure 5 b shows the volume fraction of austenite calculated from the dilatometric curves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%