2018
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine whether sensorimotor beta-frequency oscillatory power is raised during motor preparation in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD) and could therefore be a marker of abnormal “body-focused” attention.MethodsWe analyzed motor performance and beta-frequency cortical oscillations during a precued choice reaction time (RT) task with varying cue validity (50% or 95% congruence between preparation and go cues). We compared 21 patients with FMD with 13 healthy controls (HCs).ResultsIn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictive primes allow a strategic, presumably conscious, preparation for the forthcoming movement. Two previous supraliminal priming studies showed faster reaction times with high cue predictability [95% valid as opposed to non-predictive (50%)] in healthy controls, but slower or unchanged reaction times with high cue predictability in FMD ( 13 , 14 ). That is, whereas predictive supraliminal primes allow healthy volunteers to prepare movements in advance, this process did not operate as normal in FMD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predictive primes allow a strategic, presumably conscious, preparation for the forthcoming movement. Two previous supraliminal priming studies showed faster reaction times with high cue predictability [95% valid as opposed to non-predictive (50%)] in healthy controls, but slower or unchanged reaction times with high cue predictability in FMD ( 13 , 14 ). That is, whereas predictive supraliminal primes allow healthy volunteers to prepare movements in advance, this process did not operate as normal in FMD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It was similar to the sample size of 20 healthy controls in the agency study with supraliminal priming mentioned below ( 11 ). Furthermore, the sample size was relatively large, compared to previous reaction time studies in FMD with supraliminal premovement cues, which included 8 ( 12 ), 11 ( 13 ), and 21 ( 14 ) FMD patients. Thus, recruitment continued until there were 19 remaining participants in each group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with FMDs are unable to improve motor performance in predictable conditions . This may be related to the finding that those with FMDs demonstrate abnormal maintenance of beta power and failure of beta lateralization on EEG prior to the performance of a motor task, suggesting an impairment in movement prediction . The power in the beta band on EEG normally suppresses and lateralizes before voluntary movement, and these changes are more pronounced when the movement is highly predicted …”
Section: Functional Movement Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another element of disordered top‐down control is likely to be abnormal attention to the body part with the involuntary movement. This is apparent clinically, and physiological evidence for this comes from abnormal modulation of beta desynchronization in a choice reaction time task . Patients with functional myoclonus show a Bereitschaftspotential (BP) prior to their involuntary jerks .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is apparent clinically, and physiological evidence for this comes from abnormal modulation of beta desynchronization in a choice reaction time task. 6 Patients with functional myoclonus show a Bereitschaftspotential (BP) prior to their involuntary jerks. 7 The BP was originally described to precede voluntary movement and largely comes from activation of the premotor cortex and supplementary motor area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%