Abnegation, accommodation and affirmation: Three discursive modes for the institutional construction of independence among national news agency executives in Europe

Abstract

The relationship between the ownership form of news agencies and their independence has long figured centrally in debates about the quality of news agency operations. Drawing on a discursive institutional framework, this article explores how national news agency executives in Europe perform a narrated role in the discursive construction of their organizations’ internal and external independence. We set out the concept of independence discourse, which we define as the variety of ways in which news agency executives use claims about the economic independence and the internal and external autonomy of their organizational operations. Based on a discourse analysis of elite semi-structured interviews with 20 European news agency executives, we identify three discursive modes for the institutional construction of independence: (1) abnegation, (2) accommodation and (3) affirmation. These discursive modes represent a set of public and private approaches to discursively negotiating the power of both state/government and shareholders/owners. We conclude by arguing for an expanded concept of independence, one which offers an account of the complex array of forces shaping news agency operations today.

Between the state and the market: An analysis of TASS’ fall and rise

“…However, the forms of state financial control are extremely sophisticated and difficult to track (Lebedev, 2019), especially when it comes to influence on news content. As Rantanen and Kelly (2019) show elsewhere in this issue, all news-agency directors, whatever the ownership form of the agency, deny any influence on their journalists.…”

The Position and Influence of Agency News on Foreign News in Contemporary Slovak Television Production

“…At the same time, news agencies are among the most important sources of information for media companies (Nicholls, 2019; Rantanen, 2020) and are considered a permanent and verified provider of facts (Boyer, 2011), even though nowadays "news agency executives are under pressure to assure their stakeholders of their independent capacity to produce trustworthy, reliable and, to a large extent, commercially viable news" (Rantanen, Kelly, 2020). By press or news agency we mean a legal entity "... which seeks out and processes information in order to convey its remuneration in agency news to the public."…”

Toward Hybridity? Nationality, Ownership, and Governance of News Agencies in Europe

“…Leading international news agencies Reuters and AP have both crusaded for private or cooperative ownership forms as a guarantee of the freedom of news (Cooper, 1942; Mant, 1939). This discourse is still often shared by both academics and news-agency executives (Rantanen & Kelly, 2019).…”

“…The reason for doing this is that the present “container model,” where news agencies are separated from each other solely on the basis of their nationality and ownership form, is in my view unhelpful when attempting to analyze changing news-agency operations. Because ownership is viewed so ideologically—often “us against them” (Rantanen & Kelly, 2019), using fixed categories of nationality and/or ownership prevents us from seeing what all news agencies share, irrespective of their nationality and/or ownership form.…”