2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1302.1516
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ABM11 PDFs and the cross section benchmarks in NNLO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are demonstrating overall very good consistency of the ABM11 PDFs with the available LHC data. Particular aspects of these findings have been reported previously [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are demonstrating overall very good consistency of the ABM11 PDFs with the available LHC data. Particular aspects of these findings have been reported previously [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, we find m t (m t )/GeV α s (M Z ) = 0.1139 (10) and a marginal change in the gluon PDF for a variant of ABM12 fit with m t (m t ) = 162 GeV fixed and with the CMS [19,21,22] and the Tevatron [23] data included, i.e., leaving out the ATLAS data due to the larger experimental uncertainties. This is to be compared with α s (M Z ) = 0.1133 (8) for the ABM11 PDF fit and, again, demonstrates nicely the stability of the analysis, provided all correlations are accounted for. We briefly comment here on related studies, that have appeared in the literature.…”
Section: The Data For T T Production In the Abm12 Fitmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A set of χ 2 values were also evaluated for the ABM11 PDF set [87], for R = 0.4 and R = 0.6, for the p jet,max T and p jet T scale choices, in the full p T range, for individual |y| bins, as well as all the |y| bins together. In this case, tension between data and the theory prediction is observed even in individual |y| bins, with P obs values below 10 −3 for both |y| < 0.5 and 0.5 ≤ |y| < 1.0.…”
Section: Quantitative Comparison Of Data To Nlo Qcd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,42]. The uncertainty due to the choice of PDF is investigated by comparing the central values of various PDFs, namely MSTW2008NNLO, CT10NNLO [43], NNPDF2.3 [44], ABM11 [45], and HERAPDF1.5 [46]. All except for ABM11 are found to be within the MSTW2008NNLO 90% C.L.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%