2021
DOI: 10.1080/17404622.2021.2006254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ableism in the classroom: Teaching accessibility and ethos by analyzing rubrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech-as-presence and universalized listening privileges particular bodies (overwhelmingly white, able, cis-male bodies) while disciplining other bodies away from reproducing these norms. For instance, speech-as-presence reproduces ableist assumptions for speech that suggest we all embody the same mental and physical abilities to speak and hear in the classroom, marginalizing bodily-and neuro-diversity (Gunaratnam 2021;Tigert and Miller 2021). 3 Instead, by focusing on listening, we work to shift speech, disrupting the space it occupies and its role in relational strategies, including participation.…”
Section: Collaborative Personal Reflexivity On Listening In the Class...mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Speech-as-presence and universalized listening privileges particular bodies (overwhelmingly white, able, cis-male bodies) while disciplining other bodies away from reproducing these norms. For instance, speech-as-presence reproduces ableist assumptions for speech that suggest we all embody the same mental and physical abilities to speak and hear in the classroom, marginalizing bodily-and neuro-diversity (Gunaratnam 2021;Tigert and Miller 2021). 3 Instead, by focusing on listening, we work to shift speech, disrupting the space it occupies and its role in relational strategies, including participation.…”
Section: Collaborative Personal Reflexivity On Listening In the Class...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the dominant presence of speech in the classroom can marginalize particular bodies. Students navigate the ways in which their voice may be interpreted by listeners to be communicating information on their gender, nationality, sexuality, ability, as well as navigating their own understandings and embodiment of cultural expectations around communication and classroom norms (Campbell-Kibler 2007;Delph-Janiurek 1999, 2000Gunaratnam 2021;Haji Molana 2021;Tigert and Miller 2021). Speechas-presence leaves little space to recognize or engage with all the reasons our students might not participate verbally.…”
Section: Disrupting Speech-as-presencementioning
confidence: 99%