1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1997)21:2<179::aid-lsm9>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation rate of PMMA and human cornea with a frequency-quintupled Nd:YAG laser (213 nm)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it was choose to ensure proper ablation effect in PMMA and ex-vivo rabbit cornea since the absorption coefficient in PMMA and rabbit cornea is relatively lower at 266 nm than that at 193 nm. Despite the fact that the absorption coefficient at 266 nm is lower than 193 nm, the obtained ablation threshold using PMMA was approximately 328 mJ/cm 2 and the obtained ablation rate was comparable to that obtained by other UV wavelengths [ 39 ]. The threshold fluence was 328 mJ/cm 2 for the 100-pulses experiment which is slightly higher than that at 249 nm and lower than that at 308 nm as reported by Krueger et al [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Nonetheless, it was choose to ensure proper ablation effect in PMMA and ex-vivo rabbit cornea since the absorption coefficient in PMMA and rabbit cornea is relatively lower at 266 nm than that at 193 nm. Despite the fact that the absorption coefficient at 266 nm is lower than 193 nm, the obtained ablation threshold using PMMA was approximately 328 mJ/cm 2 and the obtained ablation rate was comparable to that obtained by other UV wavelengths [ 39 ]. The threshold fluence was 328 mJ/cm 2 for the 100-pulses experiment which is slightly higher than that at 249 nm and lower than that at 308 nm as reported by Krueger et al [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…25 The rate of our solid-state laser was comparable to that of the argon-fluoride excimer laser. The smoothness of the edges of the ablated porcine corneas was comparable to that reported for the 193 nm excimer laser and the 213 nm UV solid-state laser.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 7 , 8 The main difference is the two- to threefold higher absorption coefficient at 193 nm and, as a consequence, the lower threshold fluence for ablation. 9 11 Corneal ablation experiments were also performed with KrCl and KrF excimer lasers at 222 and 248 nm, respectively, but the severe thermal effects on the surrounding tissue 12 made these lasers unsuitable for refractive surgery.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%