2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.68.067403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation pressure scaling at short laser wavelength

Abstract: The ablation pressure at a 0.44-microm laser wavelength has been measured at irradiance up to 2 x 10(14) W/cm(2). The diagnostics consisted in the detection of shock breakout from stepped Al targets. By adopting large focal spots and smoothed laser beams, the lateral energy transport and "drilling effects" have been avoided. The measured scaling shows a fair agreement with analytical models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The laser ablation pressure is obtained from scaling laws from Ref. [30]. At a prepulse intensity of 2.5 Â 10 13 W/cm 2 we estimate p 1 z 4 Mbar, resulting in an energy density of 100 MJ/kg.…”
Section: Spectral Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser ablation pressure is obtained from scaling laws from Ref. [30]. At a prepulse intensity of 2.5 Â 10 13 W/cm 2 we estimate p 1 z 4 Mbar, resulting in an energy density of 100 MJ/kg.…”
Section: Spectral Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such velocities correspond to shock pressures of less than 10 Mbar. This is much lower than the ablation pressure expected on the front side on the basis of scaling laws reported in the scientific literature (34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Indeed, the value measured at the rear side of the target is much lower than the ablative pressure produced during the laser interaction.…”
Section: Shock Chronometrymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This shows top view of the crater and the internal Figure 3. In this case, laser energy on the target was ∼3.64 J corresponding to intensity ∼8 × 10 12 W/cm 2 and a shock pressure ∼3 Mbar (11,12). Effect of such pressure on the central uplift is not clear at present, and it is an interesting issue for further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%