2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation of Stable VTs Versus Substrate Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract: An extensive substrate-based ablation approach is superior to ablation targeting only clinical and stable VTs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy presenting with tolerated VT. (Ablation of Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia Versus Addition of Substrate Ablation on the Long Term Success Rate of VT Ablation (VISTA); NCT01045668).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
117
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27][28][29] However, this approach may have limited utility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, who often have a paucity of identifiable substrate (ie, small scars, few late potentials). 30 In these patients, the ablation approach is often limited to pace mapping or entrainment/activation mapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] However, this approach may have limited utility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, who often have a paucity of identifiable substrate (ie, small scars, few late potentials). 30 In these patients, the ablation approach is often limited to pace mapping or entrainment/activation mapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Other studies that only targeted clinical VTs showed a similar prognosis. 17, 18 On the other hand, DS ablation showed as good prognosis as that of extensive substrate-based ablation 6 (16% and 19%, respectively, of the VT recurrence rate at the 2-year follow-up).…”
Section: Prophylactic Linear Ablationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…trategies for ablation of scar-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) include linear lesions through pace-or entrainment-mapped sites, 1 extensive ablation of late and abnormal potentials, [2][3][4] and core isolation of scar. 5 Ablation by these methods requires delivery of many focal lesions, typically in a linear pattern, resulting in long radiofrequency and procedural times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recently published VISTA trial (Ablation of Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia Versus Addition of Substrate Ablation on the Long Term Success Rate of VT Ablation) assessing the utility of substrate-based ablation for postinfarction VT, mean procedure and radiofrequency times were 4.2 hours and 68 minutes, respectively. 3 Radiofrequency ablation around scar borders to achieve core isolation has been demonstrated as a promising approach for the treatment of VT but is also associated with long procedure time (mean 5.4 hours) and a large number of individual radiofrequency applications (111 lesions). 5 Thus, tools to create contiguous linear radiofrequency lesions rapidly could significantly enhance these VT ablation strategies by significantly decreasing procedure and radiofrequency time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%