2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation behavior of PEO coatings on niobium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porosity of PEO‐01PS surface is nearly 20% lower than PEO‐0PS (Figure 1i), where the pores are mainly formed by dielectric breakdown and gas evolution. [ 23 ] Additionally, the internal pore distribution of PEO‐xPS membranes is shown in Figure S11 (Supporting Information), the PEO‐0PS are revealed to possess more pores and gaps inside using the reconstructed stack of cross‐sectional slices. Meanwhile, according to the simulation calculation of the internal pores after cutting 1000 slices (Figure 1 h), it is found the average porosity of PEO‐0PS (73.0%) is extensively higher than PEO‐01PS (48.7%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity of PEO‐01PS surface is nearly 20% lower than PEO‐0PS (Figure 1i), where the pores are mainly formed by dielectric breakdown and gas evolution. [ 23 ] Additionally, the internal pore distribution of PEO‐xPS membranes is shown in Figure S11 (Supporting Information), the PEO‐0PS are revealed to possess more pores and gaps inside using the reconstructed stack of cross‐sectional slices. Meanwhile, according to the simulation calculation of the internal pores after cutting 1000 slices (Figure 1 h), it is found the average porosity of PEO‐0PS (73.0%) is extensively higher than PEO‐01PS (48.7%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%