2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of ultrasound backscattering to predict mechanical properties of bovine trabecular bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficients reported in Tables IV and V are comparable to values reported in recent studies for BUB, AIB, and FSAB (Hakulinen et al, 2004;Hakulinen et al, 2005;Jenson et al, 2006;Hoffmeister et al, 2008;Padilla et al, 2008;Hoffmeister, 2011). The correlation coefficients in Tables IV and V were analyzed statistically using a Fisher R to z transformation and a two-tailed test with a 95% confidence interval.…”
Section: Utility Of Nmbd and Nsbd As Bone Assessment Parameterssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation coefficients reported in Tables IV and V are comparable to values reported in recent studies for BUB, AIB, and FSAB (Hakulinen et al, 2004;Hakulinen et al, 2005;Jenson et al, 2006;Hoffmeister et al, 2008;Padilla et al, 2008;Hoffmeister, 2011). The correlation coefficients in Tables IV and V were analyzed statistically using a Fisher R to z transformation and a two-tailed test with a 95% confidence interval.…”
Section: Utility Of Nmbd and Nsbd As Bone Assessment Parameterssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Some studies have measured a parameter called broadband ultrasonic backscatter (BUB), which is the frequency averaged backscatter coefficient. BUB has been shown to be sensitive to the density, mechanical properties, and microstructure of cancellous bone (Chaffai et al, 2002;Hakulinen et al, 2004;Hakulinen et al, 2005;Hakulinen et al, 2006;Jenson et al, 2006;Padilla et al, 2008). BUB also may be sensitive to bone composition (Riekkinen et al, 2007a;Karjalainen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique is unable to measure differences in the trabecular structure, which has been shown more related to the development of trabecular bone diseases [42]. Other in vivo techniques such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) [28,78] and resonance frequency analyzers (RFA) [58,1] face the same problematic as DXA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of signals per sample was limited compared to other studies because of the small acquisition sites studied and the convex format of diaphysis bone which made unfeasible a 2-dimention scanning. Comparison with other quantitative methods can be done to correlate density, composition and mechanical properties to ultrasonic parameters 8,26,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative ultrasound (QU) analysis has been extensively explored in the last decades as a means of biological tissue status discrimination [7][8][9] . Nevertheless, its capacity in the characterization of fibrocartilaginous tissue from pseudarthrosis lesions has not been well explored yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%