1976
DOI: 10.1021/ja00440a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of the CNDO/2 and INDO MO methods to cope with nonbonded interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with previous findings that the ZPVE has only a small effect on the energy barrier. [43] Importantly, the barrier height for the 1 Ǟ 2 interconversion taking 1 as the reactant is 22.7 kcal mol -1 if ZPVE is included, which is in excellent agreement with the value of 22 kcal mol -1 measured by Eaton and Temme. [17] [16] CASSCF(2,2) 5.1 20.5 [15,16] MP2/CASSCF(2,2) 5.7 21.6 [16] MP2/CASSCF(2,2)+ZPVE 4.8 19.8 [16] CASSCF(4,4) 5.2 21.3 0.6 -56.9 [16] MP2/CASSCF(4,4) 8.4 25.2 [16] CASSCF (8,8) 6.9 24.1 0.3 [16] MP2/CASSCF (8,8) 15.1 33.5 [16] MP2/CASSCF(8,8)+ZPVE 14.9 33.4 [16] B3LYP (unrs, unpr) 3.9 28.7 -47.1 [16] BLYP (REKS) ≈10 ≈36 [47] [a] The total electronic and ZPVE energies for our best calculation of the reference point 2 are -310.91434 and 0.18178 a.u., respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is in accordance with previous findings that the ZPVE has only a small effect on the energy barrier. [43] Importantly, the barrier height for the 1 Ǟ 2 interconversion taking 1 as the reactant is 22.7 kcal mol -1 if ZPVE is included, which is in excellent agreement with the value of 22 kcal mol -1 measured by Eaton and Temme. [17] [16] CASSCF(2,2) 5.1 20.5 [15,16] MP2/CASSCF(2,2) 5.7 21.6 [16] MP2/CASSCF(2,2)+ZPVE 4.8 19.8 [16] CASSCF(4,4) 5.2 21.3 0.6 -56.9 [16] MP2/CASSCF(4,4) 8.4 25.2 [16] CASSCF (8,8) 6.9 24.1 0.3 [16] MP2/CASSCF (8,8) 15.1 33.5 [16] MP2/CASSCF(8,8)+ZPVE 14.9 33.4 [16] B3LYP (unrs, unpr) 3.9 28.7 -47.1 [16] BLYP (REKS) ≈10 ≈36 [47] [a] The total electronic and ZPVE energies for our best calculation of the reference point 2 are -310.91434 and 0.18178 a.u., respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Comparison of these data with those calculated by MR-AQCC method [9] reveals that relative stability of diradical 1b with respect to 1a is more pronounced and that the energy barrier for interconversion between structures 1a and 1b is underestimated by 8 kcal mol -1 . As previously found at MR-AQCC level, [9,30] the ZPVE correction to the energy barrier at CASSCF level is small. Refinement of the energy of the CASSCF optimized stationary points using CASPT2 method reduces the relative stability of structure 1b to 3.2 kcal mol -1 what is in …”
Section: Validation Of the Computational Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…3 and 4) practically no stabilization can be observed [14,15,26]. However, the C N D O /~ method predicts the stable 0-0 water dimer [13,141, as well as the ethylene dimer [15]. In the former case the supermolecule CND0/2 (INDO) method gives Re, = 1.60 8,…”
Section: B Systems With Repulsive Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, especially in the prediction of interaction energies and geometries of charge-transfer complexes, the results are completely erroneous [8-121 (i.e., interaction energies are too large and the intermolecular distances too short). Moreover, the recently published results of calculations for the water dimer [13,14] as well as those of ethylene dimer [15] lead to artificial geometries and not to correct stabilization energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%