The use of anti-platelet agents, such as low-dose aspirin (LDA) and clopidogrel, for primary and secondary prophylaxis against cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease is increasing in an aging society, especially in developed countries. Moreover, since the benefits of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAT) with LDA and clopidogrel have been confirmed in the treatment or prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, DAT, but not monotherapy with LDA or clopidogrel, is often used in complicated patients such as after drug-eluting stent implantation, where DAT therapy is required for more than 6 months in order to avoid potentially catastrophic stent thrombosis. The efficacy of DAT for patients with a past history of cardiovascular events is well supported in the medical literature.The downside of DAT is foregut mucosal injury, which affects almost all recipients, regardless of symptoms [1][2][3]. Thus, much attention has been focused on the prevention of mucosal injury, which can manifest as severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage or perforation. Accordingly, Tozawa et al. [4] in this issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences demonstrated that in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, rebamipide, a foregut mucosal protective agent widely used in Japan, significantly inhibited gastric mucosal damage induced by LDA alone or by DAT in healthy subjects.The doses of anti-thrombotic agents are balanced between their beneficial and their adverse gastrointestinal effects, informed in part by their mechanisms of action. LDA, a platelet cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor, not only injures the gastric mucosa, but also injures the esophageal and small bowel mucosa, even with enteric-coated formulations [2,5]. The recommended doses of aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease are 75-300 mg/day, though when benefits and adverse risks are taken into account, the optimal dose of aspirin is no more than 100 mg/day [6]. A gastric mucosal damage score of [1 according to the modified Lanza criteria [7] is observed in 93 % of healthy volunteers after administration of LDA, irrespective of age and duration of therapy [2]. Nevertheless, although the detailed biological mechanism of clopidogrel-induced mucosal damage is unclear, clopidogrel is less likely than LDA to damage the foregut mucosa, which belies the observation that clopidogrel often causes massive gastrointestinal bleeding due to its potent anti-platelet effects by the inhibition of the purinergic P2Y12 receptor expressed on the platelet cell membrane [8]. This observation is supported in a separate analysis, in analyses divided modified Lanza scores into ulcer/erosion and hemorrhage scores in subjects receiving monotherapy with LDA or clopidogrel monotherapy, the former increasing both scores, yet the latter increased the hemorrhage score more than the ulcer/erosion score [1]. Using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, monotherapy of clopidogrel increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding [hazard ratio 3.66; 95 % C...