2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702003000500001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of Latin America laboratories to detect antimicrobial resistance patterns: experience of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997-2000)

Abstract: .The accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility tests is a crucial step for the clinical management of patients with serious infections. They must be reliable and precise because they will guide antimicrobial therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most appropriate choice of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and type of confirmatory test that provides the greatest assay sensitivity have yet to be determined. For instance, in early testing, the E-test ESBL screen test with ceftazidime or cefepime as substrate, and use of Oxoid combination discs with cefotaxime and ceftazidime, were useful for demonstrating the presence of Enterobacteriaceae potentially producing ESBLs but were also associated with clinically significant false-susceptible and false-resistant results [51, 52]. Current guidance from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) describes laboratory detection of ESBL produced by E. coli, P. mirabilis , and Klebsiella spp., but not for species with inducible AmpC β -lactamases (such as Enterobacter spp.)…”
Section: Surveillance and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most appropriate choice of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and type of confirmatory test that provides the greatest assay sensitivity have yet to be determined. For instance, in early testing, the E-test ESBL screen test with ceftazidime or cefepime as substrate, and use of Oxoid combination discs with cefotaxime and ceftazidime, were useful for demonstrating the presence of Enterobacteriaceae potentially producing ESBLs but were also associated with clinically significant false-susceptible and false-resistant results [51, 52]. Current guidance from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) describes laboratory detection of ESBL produced by E. coli, P. mirabilis , and Klebsiella spp., but not for species with inducible AmpC β -lactamases (such as Enterobacter spp.)…”
Section: Surveillance and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) standardized the disk diffusion method for cefoxitin as a presumptive method of the mecA gene, but the phenotypic expression of this gene is still a challenge for microbiology laboratories (2,3,9,24,28) due to the discrepancies observed between laboratories that participate in the Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (23) . Currently, one of the main objectives for the control of hospital infections is the rational use of antimicrobials, which makes the evaluation of the accuracy of phenotypic methods used for determining the susceptibility profile essential for guaranteeing the most appropriate choice of therapeutic antimicrobials (19) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality control of laboratory procedures through a regional referral center is highly desired. 8 At present, the northern area of Lima should be considered a high-risk area for ORSA and MDRSA infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%