1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00537-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of empirical potentials (AMBER, CHARMM, CVFF, OPLS, Poltev) and semi-empirical quantum chemical methods (AM1, MNDO/M, PM3) to describe H-bonding in DNA base pairs; comparison with ab initio results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
106
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gas phase (D(r) ) 1) base pair energies (Table 1) are in line with the values reported in the literature, 28,38,40,49 indicating the correctness of the application of the force fields from the published data. The differences between the present set and the literature values are attributable to the differences in the geometry of the base pairs and also to the presence of a methyl group in place of a H on the N9 or N1 of purine or pyrimidine, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The gas phase (D(r) ) 1) base pair energies (Table 1) are in line with the values reported in the literature, 28,38,40,49 indicating the correctness of the application of the force fields from the published data. The differences between the present set and the literature values are attributable to the differences in the geometry of the base pairs and also to the presence of a methyl group in place of a H on the N9 or N1 of purine or pyrimidine, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The energy for G · C is significantly greater than that of any of the other pairs [18]. Ab initio calculations have provided both binding energies and structures of guanine-cytidine pair in the absence of solvent [24][25][26]. However, the more rigorous calculations only include the nucleobase pairs and no phosphate and deoxyribose moieties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different nature of stabilization forces in these two types of dimers cause different approaches to their theoretical investigation. The electrostatic origin of the hydrogen bonds allows to study H-bonded complexes of bases with a wide range of quantum chemical and force field methods [4][5][6][7], and , therefore, these calculations were easily extended from base pairs to trimers, tetramers, etc. [8], studying effects of cooperativity of interactions, different ways of hydrogen bonding, non-planarity of base pairs, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical force field methods are widely used for the simulation of the structure and dynamics of large fragments of DNA and it has been demonstrated recently, that several force fields describe hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions between bases very accurately [7]. However, force fields do not cover the polarization of DNA bases due to interaction with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%