1986
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198606000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of Calcium bis-Acetyl Homotaurine, a GABA Agonist, to Prevent Relapse in Weaned Alcoholics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20,22 However, other studies were performed using a 3-month treatment period. 25,26 In our study the total treatment period was six months, in the first three months patients received medication and in the following three months patients remained in the treatment without medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,20,22 However, other studies were performed using a 3-month treatment period. 25,26 In our study the total treatment period was six months, in the first three months patients received medication and in the following three months patients remained in the treatment without medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[19][20][21][22] However, other studies comparing the efficacy of acamprosate and placebo in the treatment of alcoholism did not show any statistically significant difference. [23][24][25] Regarding the medication's safeness, Lhuintre et al 26 found some side-effects, as follows: nausea (four patients of the acamprosate group versus 1 of the placebo group), erectile dysfunction (2 patients of the acamprosate group versus 1 of the placebo group) and pruritus (only 1 patient of the acamprosate group). Whitworth et al 19 reported that among some of the side-effects reported by patients diarrhea was the most frequent one in patients of the acamprosate group, what was statistically significant (p=.021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these observations, acamprosate may act on the mGluR5 receptors reducing its positive feedback control over the NMDARs [217]. Although the exact mechanism of action of acamprosate is still a matter of debate, the glutamatergic hypothesis may help to explain many of the effects of acamprosate in human alcohol dependence, especially in the acquisition of cue-elicited drinking behaviours [17,41,80,86,116,117,199].…”
Section: Acamprosatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the precise mechanism of action or cellular target of acamprosate is not fully elucidated, acamprosate appears to modulate N-methyl-D -aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity in the glutamate system, and to inhibit the upregulation of voltage-gated Ca 2 ϩ channels that is induced by chronic alcohol ingestion and states of withdrawal (Allgaier et al 2000;Popp and Lovinger 2000). Thus, acamprosate may act on neurobiological mechanisms that may persist for many months following alcohol withdrawal, and that may contribute to the vulnerability for drinking relapse (Borg 1988).The clinical safety and efficacy of acamprosate was evaluated in 16 placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of 3, 6, or 12 months duration conducted across 11 European countries and involving more than 4,500 male and female outpatients with alcohol dependence (Barrias et al 1997;Besson et al 1998;Chick et al 2000a;Geerlings et al 1997;Gual and Lehert 2001;Ladewig et al 1993;Lhuintre et al 1985Lhuintre et al , 1990Paille et al 1995;Pelc et al 1992Pelc et al , 1997Poldrugo 1997;Rousseaux et al 1996;Sass et al 1996;Tempesta et al 2000;Whitworth et al 1996). Fourteen of 16 trials showed a significant advantage for acamprosate over placebo on abstinence measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%