Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, et al

Gilfoyle, Nathalie F. P.; Blatt, Lisa S.; Anderson, R. Reeves; Goldstein, Jenna L.

doi:10.1037/e503782016-001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, lawsuits halting bans of GAC have been initiated not only by patients but also by physicians on the basis of interfering with their right to practice medicine within standards of care, as well as on being forced to discriminate against patients because of their gender identity [78,87]. Under the same premise, at least one physician has presented a lawsuit against her hospital for prohibiting her from providing GAC [88].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legislation, medicine, and politics: care for gender diverse youth

Preston,

Lopez

2023

Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes &Amp; Obesity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of review A recent increase in legislation in the United States prohibiting gender-affirming care (GAC) for transgender youth follows a wave of its politicization despite support from all pertinent mainstream medical associations. This review describes the standards of GAC for transgender youth, the origins of legislation prohibiting this care, a review of current legislation in the United States and a discussion on the impact on patients, providers, and the medical field. Recent findings A critical evaluation of historical parallels and current organizations supporting this legislation reveals it stems not from concerns within the medical field but from political and religious interests. This intrusion sets a dangerous precedent, undermining evidence-based medicine, providers’ ability to practice according to standards of care, and patients’ and guardians’ autonomy and medical decision-making. This wave of antitrans rhetoric and legislation has resulted in threats to health providers and hospitals, ‘moral distress” in providers, and migration of providers and patients from hostile states. Summary Similar to antiabortion legislation, these legislative efforts will likely result in negative health outcomes and worsening disparities. The medical community must confront these forces directly through an understanding of the political and structural forces at play and adopting strategies to leverage collective power.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legislation, medicine, and politics: care for gender diverse youth

Preston,

Lopez

2023

Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes &Amp; Obesity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, a change in host fiber intake is positively correlated with a change of 15% in gut microbiota abundance on the next day [50]. A study of 24 h food records and with fecal shotgun metagenomic analysis of 34 healthy humans collected daily over a 17-day period suggested that daily fluctuations in the microbiome are associated with food choices [51]. As similar foods have different effects on the microbiome of different people [51], it will be necessary in the future to examine the effects of fruit granola and sweet potato as dietary fiber-rich foods on the microbiome of individual subjects.…”

Section: Second-meal Effect and Dietary Fibermentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of intake of four types of snack with different timings on postprandial glucose levels after dinner

Masutomi¹,

Mineshita

Ishihara³

et al. 2023

Eur J Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose It has been reported that the consumption of fruit granola (FG), mulberry leaves, and barley cookies as an afternoon snack suppresses the postprandial increase in glucose levels at dinner. However, there have been no reports on the second-meal effect of snacking on popular snacks, such as potato chips (PC), roasted sweet potato (SP), and black beans (BB), or on the interval between snacking and dinner. Method The present study was an open-label randomized crossover trial of five study groups (PC, SP, BB, FG, and no snack) regarding the second-meal effects with different intervals between snacks and dinner. The subjects consumed prescribed meals for lunch and dinner at 12:00 and 19:00, and a snack fixed at 838 kJ (= 200 kcal) at 15:00 or 17:00. Results When the participants snacked at 15:00, the postprandial glucose elevation at dinner was suppressed in the FG and SP groups, and the area under the curve (AUC) was also low. When they snacked at 17:00, the postprandial glucose elevation was suppressed in all the groups. The AUCs for PC, FG, and SP were lower than those for no snacking. On the other hand, carbohydrate intake increased with snacking, but the total AUC of snacks and dinner did not differ in any of the groups. The duration of hyperglycemia decreased with snack intake, as did the glucose amplitude. Conclusion We believe that the intake of carbohydrates and soluble fiber in snacks is an important factor in the second-meal effect at dinner. These results will contribute to the development of snacking and research into the second-meal effect.

show abstract

Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, et al

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Legislation, medicine, and politics: care for gender diverse youth

Legislation, medicine, and politics: care for gender diverse youth

Effects of intake of four types of snack with different timings on postprandial glucose levels after dinner

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About