Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index

Abstract

SUMMARY The effect of refractive‐index mismatch, as encountered in the observation of biological specimens, on the image acquisition process in confocal fluorescence microscopy is investigated theoretically. The analysis takes the vectorial properties of light into account and is valid for high numerical apertures. Quantitative predictions on the decrease of resolution, intensity drop and shift of focus are given for practical situations. When observing with a numerical aperture of 1·3 (oil immersion) and an excitation wavelength of 514 nm the centre of the focus shifts 1·7 μm per 10 μm of axial displacement in an aqueous medium, thus yielding an image that is scaled by a factor of 1·2 in the axial direction. Furthermore, it can be expected that for a fluorescent plane 20 μm deep inside an aqueous medium the peak intensity is 40% less than for a plane which is 10 μm deep. In addition, the axial resolution is decreased by a factor of 1·4. The theory was experimentally verified for test samples with different refractive indices.

Stimulated Emission Depletion Microscopy Resolves Individual Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Diamond Nanocrystals

“…Rather, similar aberrations are expected for imaging of micrometer-sized diamond nanospheres independent of the imaging method, i.e., they would equally affect confocal, (semi)stochastic photoswitching and STED-like imaging techniques. 16 As the maximum and minimum field intensities of both the excitation and STED beam vary a little over the ND volume, the effective resolution is expected to vary slightly across the particle. This effect will also compromise the effective excitation field intensities in confocal and (semi)stochastic photoswitching imaging techniques in direct analogy.…”

Probing events with single molecule sensitivity in zebrafish and Drosophila embryos by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

“…This again suggests that accurate FCS measurements were limited within 50 lm depth. The limited working distance is restricted by strong and multiple light scattering and spherical aberrations induced by the heterogeneous refractive index of tissues (Hell et al, 1993), as cells comprise different subcompartments and macromolecules, which make the cell optically nonhomogeneous. Furthermore, light scattering particularly affects the signal to noise ratio in confocal illumination, which achieves optical sectioning with a detection pinhole that rejects out-offocus light.…”

Imaging Regions of Transport Across Human Stratum Corneum during High-Voltage and Low-Voltage Exposures

“…While the "thickness" of such a section is the lateral resolution of the particular lens, the resolution of these sections deteriorates as a function of depth into the tissue due to index of refraction mismatch between the optics (n ) 1.515) and the biological sample (ranging from 1.3 for water to ∼1.6 for skin). 36 Because the endogenous fluorescence of the skin was negligible, all observed fluorescence originated from experimentally-introduced material.…”

“…Optical sectioning of the skin is restricted to its outer 20 µm due to light scattering and absorption of the emitted fluorescence 33 and refractive index mismatch of the skin and the microscope optics. 36 …”