2023
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2266594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberration correction in abdominal histotripsy

Ellen Yeats,
Timothy L. Hall
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the speed of sound between tissues and the water bath may cause phase shifts, which can result in a change in cavitation bubble cloud location. 29 The purpose of this sub‐investigation was to assess whether the materials used for the phantom would cause notable changes (aberration) in the bubble cloud location due to the differences in the speed of sound compared to water. Large aberrations would limit the utility of the phantom to predict targeting accuracy since the results would not be representative of the targeting accuracy observed in vivo.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the speed of sound between tissues and the water bath may cause phase shifts, which can result in a change in cavitation bubble cloud location. 29 The purpose of this sub‐investigation was to assess whether the materials used for the phantom would cause notable changes (aberration) in the bubble cloud location due to the differences in the speed of sound compared to water. Large aberrations would limit the utility of the phantom to predict targeting accuracy since the results would not be representative of the targeting accuracy observed in vivo.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 While CBCT targeting has been shown to be feasible and accurate, 9 a framework that allows for treatment planning in advance of the procedure has yet to be developed. Treatment planning prior to the day of therapy would allow adequate time for implementing advanced planning techniques such as acoustic field simulation for aberration correction 10 and acoustic obstruction avoidance, in addition to precise target delineation. Additionally, CBCT images have lower image quality than multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 11 and have a smaller field of view, introducing visibility challenges such as truncation artifacts and incomplete liver coverage in the image volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%