2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant promoter methylation and silencing of the POU2F3 gene in cervical cancer

Abstract: POU2F3 (OCT11, Skn-1a) is a keratinocyte-specific POU transcription factor whose expression is tied to squamous epithelial stratification. It is also a candidate tumor suppressor gene in cervical cancer (CC) because it lies in a critical loss of heterozygosity region on11q23.3 in that cancer, and its expression is lost in more than 50% of CC tumors and cell lines. We now report that the loss of POU2F3 expression is tied to the hypermethylation of CpG islands in the POU2F3 promoter. Bisulfite sequencing analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that there were apparently no differences in methylation in general between parental HeLa cells or RAR␤ expressing clones. Notably, treatment of cells with decitabine did not induce demethylation of the Ha-Ras 3Ј-VTR, which is consistent with previous reports showing that certain genes were refractory to demethylation (46,47). In contrast, when RAR␤ expressing clones were treated under the same experimental conditions, the 254-bp fragment could no longer be amplified, indicating that demethylation of the HPV-18 enhancer was successful (Fig.…”
Section: De Novo Dna Methylation and Heterochromatinization Around Thsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This indicates that there were apparently no differences in methylation in general between parental HeLa cells or RAR␤ expressing clones. Notably, treatment of cells with decitabine did not induce demethylation of the Ha-Ras 3Ј-VTR, which is consistent with previous reports showing that certain genes were refractory to demethylation (46,47). In contrast, when RAR␤ expressing clones were treated under the same experimental conditions, the 254-bp fragment could no longer be amplified, indicating that demethylation of the HPV-18 enhancer was successful (Fig.…”
Section: De Novo Dna Methylation and Heterochromatinization Around Thsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, even though epigenetic states are potentially reversible, treatment with agents generally affecting DNA methylation have their natural limitation due to their non-selectivity and sometimes also because of their inefficiency to demethylate particular CpG sequences. 41,42 Moreover, simultaneous change of a whole network of epigenetically silenced genes by inhibitory drugs may negatively interfere with the final outcome of a proper immunological response. 43 In fact, preincubation with sodium butyrate did not unmask those cells selected by our method (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oct11 expression is lost in more than 50% of cervical tumors and cell lines. Silencing of the Oct11 gene by aberrant DNA methylation of its promoter has been observed in 39% of cervical tumors but has not been noted in normal epithelium (195). …”
Section: Pathophysiological Roles Of Oct Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%