2002
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.90016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant methylation patterns at the two‐cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure

Abstract: The fertilized mouse egg actively demethylates the paternal genome within a few hours after fertilization, whereas the maternal genome is only passively demethylated by a replication-dependent mechanism after the two-cell stage. This evolutionarily conserved assymetry in the early diploid mammalian embryo may have a role in methylation reprogramming of the two very different sets of sperm and egg chromatin for somatic development and formation of totipotent cells. Immunofluorescence staining with an antibody a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
142
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
142
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Epigenetic abnormalities of ES cells are not corrected in differentiated tissue derivatives (30), and the epigenetic status of the embryo used to derive ES cells may influence the developmental potential of the ES cells obtained. Additionally, in vitro fertilization, embryo culture, nuclear transfer, and superovulation are known to cause methylation defects that can result in abnormal development (31,32), and further consideration must be afforded to how these manipulations are affecting the normalcy of resulting ES cell lines, especially in the human. The paucity of human embryos available for research and the lack of an analogous chimera assay impede rigorous characterization of the normal developmental potential of hES cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetic abnormalities of ES cells are not corrected in differentiated tissue derivatives (30), and the epigenetic status of the embryo used to derive ES cells may influence the developmental potential of the ES cells obtained. Additionally, in vitro fertilization, embryo culture, nuclear transfer, and superovulation are known to cause methylation defects that can result in abnormal development (31,32), and further consideration must be afforded to how these manipulations are affecting the normalcy of resulting ES cell lines, especially in the human. The paucity of human embryos available for research and the lack of an analogous chimera assay impede rigorous characterization of the normal developmental potential of hES cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies evaluating DNA methylation patterns in developing NT embryos indicate that demethylation and remethylation events are not always faithfully recapitulated in the mouse (Shi & Haaf 2002, Mann et al 2003) and the cow (Bourc'his et al 2001, Dean et al 2001, Kang et al 2002. It is also clear that histone acetylation is sometimes aberrant in bovine NT embryos (Santos et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes are associated with both early developmental failure (35,45) or serious phenotypic defects (reviewed in refs. 46 and 47).…”
Section: Function Of Pronuclear Demethylation?mentioning
confidence: 99%