2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aberrant Function of Learning and Cognitive Control Networks Underlie Inefficient Cognitive Flexibility in Anorexia Nervosa: A Cross-Sectional fMRI Study

Abstract: ObjectivesPeople with Anorexia Nervosa exhibit difficulties flexibly adjusting behaviour in response to environmental changes. This has previously been attributed to problematic behavioural shifting, characterised by a decrease in fronto-striatal activity. Additionally, alterations of instrumental learning, which relies on fronto-striatal networks, may contribute to the observation of inflexible behaviour. The authors sought to investigate the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility and learning in Anorexia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, persistence was associated with error responses in the left IFG and dACC, as well as dACC adaptive-control. The absence of a significant association between set-shifting and cingulo-opercular effects may seem to contradict prior studies that have reported increased activity in cingulo-opercular regions during rule switches (Hampshire, Gruszka, & Owen, 2008; Konishi et al, 2002; Konishi et al, 1998; Lao-Kaim et al, 2015). However, we intentionally measured cingulo-opercular activity during error detection and subsequent improvements in performance—that is, activity related to overcoming obstacles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, persistence was associated with error responses in the left IFG and dACC, as well as dACC adaptive-control. The absence of a significant association between set-shifting and cingulo-opercular effects may seem to contradict prior studies that have reported increased activity in cingulo-opercular regions during rule switches (Hampshire, Gruszka, & Owen, 2008; Konishi et al, 2002; Konishi et al, 1998; Lao-Kaim et al, 2015). However, we intentionally measured cingulo-opercular activity during error detection and subsequent improvements in performance—that is, activity related to overcoming obstacles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Relative to rule maintenance trials, switching rules evokes a robust frontal P3a component (Barceló, 2003) that is modulated by uncertainty of decision-response outcomes (Kopp & Lange, 2013). Efficient shifting in healthy young adults engages left precuneus, left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) compared to correctly repeating a rule (Lao-Kaim et al, 2015). In addition, parametrically increasing rule search demands elicits greater activity in the bilateral IFG and MFG, bilateral inferior parietal lobe, right angular gyrus, superior parietal lobule, precuneus and putamen (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, AN patients have also been shown to have altered frontostriatal activation on executive function tasks, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (Lao-Kaim et al, 2015), and delay discounting (Wierenga et al, 2014; Decker et al, 2015). During reward conditioning, AN patients show abnormally high SN activity relative to controls (Frank et al, 2012), and an increased preference for delayed rewards over immediate rewards.…”
Section: Abnormalities Of Sn-cstc Loop Circuits In Psychiatric Illnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of eating behaviors, including the processing of tastes, appearances, and scents of food, and satiety, reward, motivation, reappraisal, craving, and consumption associated with food have been investigated with fMRI (Giuliani & Pfeifer, 2015; Huerta, Sarkar, Duong, Laird, & Fox, 2014; Jiang, Soussignan, Schaal, & Royet, 2015; Murdaugh, Cox, Cook, & Weller, 2012; Robinson, Fischer, Ahuja, Lesser, & Maniates, 2016; Rolls, 2015; Rolls, Kellerhals, & Nichols, 2015; Simmons et al, 2014; Thomas et al, 2015; van Bloemendaal et al, 2015; Wang, Smith, & Delgado, 2016). Evaluation of FA has demonstrated alterations in brain regions involved in reward processing, homeostatic regulation, emotional reactivity, and executive control (Gearhardt, Boswell, & Potenza, 2014; Lao-Kaim et al, 2015; Simon et al, 2016; Ziauddeen, Farooqi, & Fletcher, 2012). Because neuroimaging of FA is still in preliminary stages, only a few studies are currently available to review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%