„aber Ich Notire Mich, Für Mich.“ – Die Ix.
      Abteilung Der Kritischen Gesamtausgabe Von Nietzsches Werken

Röllin, Beat; Stockmar, René

doi:10.1515/9783110192827.0.35

Nietzsche-Studien

2007

DOI: 10.1515/9783110192827.0.35

|View full text |Cite

„aber Ich Notire Mich, Für Mich.“ – Die Ix. Abteilung Der Kritischen Gesamtausgabe Von Nietzsches Werken

Beat Röllin¹,

René Stockmar²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Parkhurst

2020

Nietzsche-Studien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a review of the literature and historical evidence, I argue that the use of the methodological principle known as the priority principle in Anglo-American Nietzsche scholarship is inconsistent and irreconcilable with historical evidence. It attempts to demarcate between the published works and the Nachlass. However, there are no agreed upon necessary and sufficient conditions of a particular textual object being considered “Nachlass.” This absence leads to implicit and often tacit value demarcation criteria that can be broadly grouped into four types of consideration: publication, authorization, publicness, and audience. Each of these criteria pick out a different set of texts as “Nachlass.” Thus, despite the veneer of agreement, the most broadly accepted methodological approach in the Anglo-American tradition of Nietzsche scholarship is applied inconsistently. I argue that we must either offer necessary and sufficient conditions for a piece of text being Nachlass, or we ought to abandon such abstract criteria altogether and embrace a contextual and historical approach. I then argue that the first option is impossible given historical evidence. I conclude this article by explicating several recent German approaches to the Nachlass which I think can offer a new possible approach.

show abstract

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Parkhurst

2020

Nietzsche-Studien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Chronologie der Manuskripte 1885–89. Nachtrag zu KGW IX

Röllin

2024

Nietzsche-Studien

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronology of the Manuscripts 1885–89. Appendix to KGW IX. After the completion of the topological manuscript edition in section IX of the Kritische Gesamtausgabe der Werke (KGW IX), the additional chronological indexing of the late Nachlass remained a desideratum. The current manuscript closes this editorial gap. As an appendix to KGW IX, the chronology of the manuscripts 1885–89 provides the date for each distinguishable layer of inscription for every manuscript and note edited in KGW IX. In the first part of the following chronology, the dated inscription layers for all late manuscripts from notebook N VII 1 to the scattered notes are recorded topologically. In the second part, the inscription layers are indexed chronologically from spring 1885 to the beginning of January 1889.

show abstract

The Evolution of Valuation in Bankruptcy

Simkovic

2016

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

„aber Ich Notire Mich, Für Mich.“ – Die Ix. Abteilung Der Kritischen Gesamtausgabe Von Nietzsches Werken

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Does Nietzsche havea“Nachlass”?

Chronologie der Manuskripte 1885–89. Nachtrag zu KGW IX

The Evolution of Valuation in Bankruptcy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About