2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59692-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abductive Question-Answer System ( $$\mathsf {AQAS}$$ ) for Classical Propositional Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last but not least, the method of Socratic proofs has been applied in formal modelling of abductive reasoning (cf. Urbański & Wiśniewski 2015, Chlebowski & Gajda 2017. As it has been shown in (Wiśniewski 2018), in many cases it is possible to ›extract‹ multiple conclusion-entailment, the basic semantic concept by means of which question evocation and erotetic implication are defined, from the consequence relation of the underlying logic of d-wffs.…”
Section: Other Erotetic Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, the method of Socratic proofs has been applied in formal modelling of abductive reasoning (cf. Urbański & Wiśniewski 2015, Chlebowski & Gajda 2017. As it has been shown in (Wiśniewski 2018), in many cases it is possible to ›extract‹ multiple conclusion-entailment, the basic semantic concept by means of which question evocation and erotetic implication are defined, from the consequence relation of the underlying logic of d-wffs.…”
Section: Other Erotetic Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abductive reasoning can be used to extract information compatible with the (rule-based) KB [29] from a query. This option does not allow obtaining information already contained in F , and it would be in principle more general.…”
Section: Notions Related To Knowledge Harnessingmentioning
confidence: 99%