2013
DOI: 10.5505/bsbd.2013.59144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal gunshot wound to pregnant woman at 22 weeks of gestation: A case report

Abstract: bsbd@balikesir.edu.tr www.bau-sbdergisi.com ÖZET Hamilelik sırasındaki delici travmalar günümüz şiddet toplumunda giderek artan bir problem haline gelmektedir. Delici travma sonucu fetal, plasental, kord ve intraabdominal organ hasarları rapor edilmiştir. Bu travmaların derecesinin belirlenip tedavisinin yapılması için sıklıkla eksploratif laparotomi gerekli olmaktadır. 26 yaşında gebe hasta ateşli silah yaralanması sonrası hastanemiz acil servisine getirildi. Operasyon odasında preoperatif olarak yapılan sono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, 4-8,12-20,23-25,27-36,38-44 few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation