Abdominal Binder Use Following Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

Kliethermes, C.J.; Blaźek, K; Nijjar, B.; Ali, Kamran; Kliethermes, Stephanie; Guan, Xu

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.492

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Removal of the ectopic pregnancy is done laparoscopically if the patient is hemodynamically stable. LESS has become a viable option, as only it requires only one incision which leads to fewer surgical complications such as bleeding, infection, postoperative pain [ 27 , 28 ], and hospital stay.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Rezai

Giovane

Minton

et al. 2018

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Heterotopic pregnancy occurs when two pregnancies occur simultaneously in the uterus and an ectopic location. Treatment includes removal of the ectopic pregnancy with preservation of the intrauterine pregnancy. Treatment is done laparoscopically with either a Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or a multiport laparoscopic surgery. Case We present a case of a first trimester heterotopic pregnancy in a 42-year-old gravida 5, para 0-1-3-1 female with previous history of left salpingectomy, who underwent laparoscopic right salpingectomy and lysis of adhesions (LOA) via Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS). Conclusion Although LESS for benign OB/GYN cases is feasible, safe, and equally effective compared to the conventional laparoscopic techniques, studies have suggested no clinically relevant advantages in the frequency of perioperative complications between LESS and conventional methods. No data on the cost effectiveness of LESS versus conventional methods are available. LESS utilizes only one surgical incision which may lead to decreased pain and better cosmetic outcome when compared to multiport procedure. One significant undesirable aspect of LESS is the crowding of the surgical area as only one incision is made. Therefore, all instruments go through one port, which can lead to obstruction of the surgeon's vision and in some cases higher rate of procedure failure resulting in conversion to multiport procedure.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Rezai

Giovane

Minton

et al. 2018

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In previous studies, LESS has been shown to reduce surgical disturbance and recovery time compared with multiport surgery [22,27,28]. However, recent data also suggest that LESS results in higher rates of umbilical hernia compared with multiport surgery, particularly in pregnant patients.…”

Section: Safety and Feasibilitymentioning

confidence: 98%

Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series

Xiao¹,

Fu²,

Duan³

et al. 2020

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Benefits of a Binder in the Postoperative Period of Abdominal Surgery

Ramos

Topa

Carvalho

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Postoperative complications are a reality in the context of abdominal surgery, which is why the use of an abdominal bandage was strongly recommended for decades. Objectives: The aim is to identify the benefits for the patient and verify the pertinence of the recommendation for its use, taking into account the advancement of surgical techniques. Methodology: A integrative review of the literature was carried out, in which studies from 2017 to 2022 were identified in the database aggregators EBSCOhost (CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, Cochrane Plus Collection) and Web of Science (SciELO). Results: 137 articles were identified, of which 15 were included for review. Discussion: In the literature, several benefits are pointed out with the use of abdominal bandage, namely in the healing of the surgical wound, in comfort and in early mobilization. However, it was in pain control that there was greater benefit for patients in most articles. Considering these factors, the patient becomes more cooperative in performing recovery exercises. Conclusion: Current scientific evidence indicates that abdominal taping, when correctly applied, is an effective strategy that favors the functional recovery of patients undergoing abdominal surgery by laparotomy.

show abstract

Abdominal Binder Use Following Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series

The Benefits of a Binder in the Postoperative Period of Abdominal Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About