Abdominal Applications of 3.0-T MR Imaging: Comparative Review versus a 1.5-T System

Abstract

With the development of dedicated receiver coils and increased gradient performance, 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) systems are gaining wider acceptance in clinical practice. The expected twofold increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with that of 1.5-T MR systems may help improve spatial resolution or increase temporal resolution when used with parallel acquisition techniques. Several issues must be considered when applying 3.0-T MR in the abdomen, including the alteration of the radiofrequency field and relaxation time, increase in energy deposition and susceptibility effects, and problems associated with motion artifacts. For the evaluation of liver lesions, higher SNR and greater resolution achieved with the 3.0-T system could translate into better detection of malignant lesions on T2-weighted images obtained with adjusted imaging parameters. For the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary diseases, high-resolution T2-weighted imaging using single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences is useful; improvement in SNR was noticeable on two-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatographic images. For the preoperative imaging of rectal cancer, a single-shot sequence is useful for dramatically decreasing imaging time while maintaining image quality. Substantial modification of examination protocols, with optimized imaging parameters and sequence designs along with ongoing development of hardware, could contribute to an increased role of the 3.0-T system for abdominal MR examinations.

Can preoperative diffusion-weighted MRI predict postoperative hepatic insufficiency after curative resection of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma? A pilot study

“…A significant difference between our study and that of Lewin et al is that we used a 3-T MRI system. The overall quality of diffusionweighted images with a 3-T MRI system is known to be superior to that of a 1.5-T MRI system, which was used in the study of Lewin et al [28,29]. Of the various baseline characteristics, only LSM values were significantly different between patients with postoperative hepatic insufficiency and those without.…”

Preoperative Evaluation of Lower Rectal Cancer by Pelvic MR with and without Gel Filling

“…Because the clinical information obtained from 3 T and 1.5 T MRI with turbo spin-echo was not much different. Turbo spin-echo sequence of 3T provided a much higher matrix size than that of 1.5T and it provided a much greater resolution of certain anatomic structures but it produced noisier images by peristaltic artifacts (27). Thirdly, during analysis of MR exam sets, tumor location -such as anterior wall, posterior wall, lateral spread, etc -was not considered.…”

Comparison of dynamic MRI at 3.0T and MDCT of pancreatobiliary disease: Evaluation with source, MPR, CPR, and MIP images for image quality and hepatic arterial and portal venous vessel conspicuity

“…These thinner images not only provide increased resolution and improved high-image quality, but also allow the production of excellent MPR and CPR images without the stair-step artifacts left by thicker slices. One frequently mentioned shortcoming of most MIP images using Gd-enhanced fast gradient-echo sequences is their limited spatial resolution compared with techniques such as CTA or digital subtraction angiography (5,21,22). Further, potential challenges exist when conducting contrast-enhanced MR angiography at higher field strength.…”