1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63352-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Diagnostic Review and New Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity and specificity are both close to 100% when compared with operative findings. In about 1% to 3% of the time, the aorta cannot be visualized because of bowel gas or obesity (58)(59)(60). In general, ultrasound is an ideal test for mass screening (61).…”
Section: Abdominal Ultrasound and Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity and specificity are both close to 100% when compared with operative findings. In about 1% to 3% of the time, the aorta cannot be visualized because of bowel gas or obesity (58)(59)(60). In general, ultrasound is an ideal test for mass screening (61).…”
Section: Abdominal Ultrasound and Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-table lateral plain radiographs were once the most widely used test to evaluate for AAA, but are not sufficiently accurate for a potentially catastrophic disease (11). Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is nearly 100% sensitive and specific and may also serve to identify alternative diagnoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periaortic collections, intramural air, and soft tissue infiltration are other common radiographic findings [32,33]. Moreover, rapidly enlarging or rapidly evolving aneurysms are highly suggestive of infection [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%