2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Reduces Mortality: Meta-analyses of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Lederle 3 and Koelemay, 4 however, revealed errors in the meta-analysis 2 and claimed that the reduction in all-cause mortality failed to reach statistical significance. Furthermore, Lederle 3 indicated that previous meta-analyses, including ours, 1,2,[5][6][7][8] with the exception of a systematic review by Fleming et al 9 for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), had made the same error of using age unadjusted deaths from one of the randomized controlled trials (Western Australia study 10 ). In 2009, Thompson et al 11 presented new information from the 10-year follow-up in another randomized controlled trial (Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study [MASS]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3 Lederle 3 and Koelemay, 4 however, revealed errors in the meta-analysis 2 and claimed that the reduction in all-cause mortality failed to reach statistical significance. Furthermore, Lederle 3 indicated that previous meta-analyses, including ours, 1,2,[5][6][7][8] with the exception of a systematic review by Fleming et al 9 for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), had made the same error of using age unadjusted deaths from one of the randomized controlled trials (Western Australia study 10 ). In 2009, Thompson et al 11 presented new information from the 10-year follow-up in another randomized controlled trial (Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study [MASS]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%