2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abatement of Fine Particle Emissions from a Coal-Fired Power Plant Based on the Condensation of SO3 and Water Vapor

Abstract: A new process was proposed to reduce fine particle emissions in coal-fired flue gases via the condensation of SO3 and water vapor. In this new process, hot atomized water was sprayed before the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) system to decrease the flue gas temperature and increase the flue gas humidity, causing the flue gas temperature to drop below the acid dew point; thus, SO3 would condense on the particle surfaces ahead of the ESP, which would enhance the fine particle removal efficiency of the ESP. Then… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the slurry scrubbing in the spray scrubber, the relative humidity of the flue gas could reach 100%. With the decrease of the gas temperature, the water vapor turned to be supersaturated and condensed onto the sulfuric acid aerosols, which made these aerosols grow larger . The removal efficiency of the WESP system was relevant to the particle/droplet sizes, and the larger size was beneficial for the removal process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the slurry scrubbing in the spray scrubber, the relative humidity of the flue gas could reach 100%. With the decrease of the gas temperature, the water vapor turned to be supersaturated and condensed onto the sulfuric acid aerosols, which made these aerosols grow larger . The removal efficiency of the WESP system was relevant to the particle/droplet sizes, and the larger size was beneficial for the removal process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SO 4 2– concentrations of the condensate were analyzed with an ion chromatograph analyzer (ICS-2100, Dionex Ltd., U.S.A.). Using the sampling volume of the flue gas and the concentration of SO 4 2– in solution, the concentrations of SO 3 were calculated. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling system of CCM consists of three main components, namely sampling gun with heating and filtering unit, condenser tube and water bath unit, and flue gas sampling device [26], as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCM mainly uses the principle of physical adsorption. After the flue gas temperature decreases, SO 3 condenses into acid mist, which is then collected by centrifugal force [26]. The applied range of the CCM is relatively wide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%