Abandonment of Low-Vision Devices in an Outpatient Population

Abstract

Purpose To investigate abandonment rate of prescribed low vision devices for near tasks and factors associated with abandonment in a U.S. outpatient population. Methods A telephone survey was administered to 88 patients with low vision from four clinical sites approximately one year after examination and prescription of devices. Patients were surveyed on timing and frequency of use and reasons for abandonment of devices. The main outcome measure (abandonment) was defined as patient report of no use of prescribed device in the previous three months. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate significant vision and demographic factors related to abandonment. Results Of 119 prescribed devices, 19% (95% CI, 12–26) had not been used within the previous three months. Mean (±SD) better eye visual acuity at examination was 0.61±0.29 logMAR and mean age was 77±17 years. Mean time between device prescription and survey was 11±3 months. Device abandonment was not associated with age (p = 0.863), time since prescription (p = 0.125), visual acuity (p = 0.804), or category of magnification device (spectacle, handheld, stand, or video) (p = 0.412). There was a significant association between documented non-central visual field loss and abandonment of magnification device (p=0.046). Repeat administration of the survey resulted in the same abandonment classification in 15 of 15 patients (100%). Conclusions Abandonment rate was similar for this outpatient population to those previously reported in the U.S. veteran inpatient population and in other countries. Patients with visual field loss may be more likely to abandon prescribed devices.

Use of Prescribed Optical Devices in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

“…Only 71% were reportedly used in the prior week. Reasons for abandonment were similar to those reported by veterans 12 , including a different device was used for the task, the device was ineffective for the task or the patient’s vision had worsened 14 . Device abandonment was not associated with age, gender, visual acuity, training, study center or diagnosis.…”

“…Our findings are consistent with previous research on device use and persons with low vision. 11–14 We are not aware of any other published studies of device use among patients with AMD undertaken since anti-VEGF treatments came into widespread use. The patients enrolled in this study were seen since 2008, when those treatments were broadly available.…”

“…The only recent study of device use surveyed patients of 4 university based clinics an average of 11 months after a low vision device was prescribed. 14 Only 6 patients with AMD were included in this study. Of the total 88 patients, 19 had abandoned at least one device.…”

What Do Low-Vision Users Really Want from Smart Glasses? Faces, Text and Perhaps No Glasses at All

“…Dougherty et al [13] identified that low-vision devices are not used by the target group. On reason for this abandonment could be that the devices do not match the users' needs.…”

Tablet and Smartphone Accessibility Features in the Low Vision Rehabilitation

“…Among these devices, handheld magnifiers are the most commonly prescribed and electronic magnifiers are the least. 5 All of these devices are still utilised a great deal among the visually impaired population. However, limitations exist with all these devices.…”