Abstracts Accepted for Publication 2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.6824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AB0657 Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in relation to gastrointestinal symptoms in systemic sclerosis

Abstract: BackgroundAutonomic dysfunction, smooth muscle fibrosis and vascular damage lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). SIBO is characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, malabsorption and malnutrition.ObjectivesTo evaluate by NIH PROMIS® gastrointestinal symptoms scales and SIBO by hydrogen breath test (HBT) in patients with SSc.MethodsWe include 68 patients with SSc (ACR-EULAR 2015) who signed informed consent. NIH PROMIS®questionarie was applied to evaluated g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data was reported in 3 studies. 36 , 37 , 44 There was substantial heterogeneity noted in the analysis (I 2 = 82.00%, P = 0.001). Although data could be extracted from only limited studies, SSc-patients who were SIBO positive as compared to those who were SIBO negative, there was significant difference in prevalence of symptoms like bloating 37 , 44 (84.8% [95% CI, 73.9-92.4] vs 60.4% [95% CI, 46.0-73.5]), dyspepsia 29 , 36 (63.2% [95% CI, 38.3-83.7] vs 22.2% [95% CI, 14.1-32.2]), and abdominal pain 37 (86.4% [95% CI, 65.1-97.1] vs 31% [95% CI, 15.2-50.8]) but no significant difference was noted in regard to prevalence of dysphagia 36 (66.7% [95% CI, 34.8-90.1] vs 37.7% [95% CI, 26.8-49.4]) and weight loss 24 , 29 (53.3% [95% CI, 16.5-78.7] vs 13.8% [95% CI, 3.8-31.6]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This data was reported in 3 studies. 36 , 37 , 44 There was substantial heterogeneity noted in the analysis (I 2 = 82.00%, P = 0.001). Although data could be extracted from only limited studies, SSc-patients who were SIBO positive as compared to those who were SIBO negative, there was significant difference in prevalence of symptoms like bloating 37 , 44 (84.8% [95% CI, 73.9-92.4] vs 60.4% [95% CI, 46.0-73.5]), dyspepsia 29 , 36 (63.2% [95% CI, 38.3-83.7] vs 22.2% [95% CI, 14.1-32.2]), and abdominal pain 37 (86.4% [95% CI, 65.1-97.1] vs 31% [95% CI, 15.2-50.8]) but no significant difference was noted in regard to prevalence of dysphagia 36 (66.7% [95% CI, 34.8-90.1] vs 37.7% [95% CI, 26.8-49.4]) and weight loss 24 , 29 (53.3% [95% CI, 16.5-78.7] vs 13.8% [95% CI, 3.8-31.6]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 ) identified 28 studies suitable for this systematic review and the subsequent meta-analysis. Eleven out of 28 studies 22 - 32 were case-control studies while 17 33 - 49 were prevalence studies. The specifics of these studies in relation to methodology for the diagnosis of SIBO and the characteristics of the patient cohorts are provided in Table 2 and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations