2015
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AB0445 Exposure–Efficacy Analysis of Mavrilimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Modeling and Simulation of Phase II Clinical Data

Abstract: BackgroundMavrilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (GM–CSFR) α, is in Phase IIb investigation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).ObjectivesWe characterized the exposure–efficacy relationship of mavrilimumab with data from two Phase II randomized controlled trials of patients with moderate to severe RA, via population modeling and clinical simulations.MethodsIn a Phase IIa study, adult patients with active RA received 7 s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the study was not powered to demonstrate statistical significance between mavrilimumab and golimumab, in sDMARD-IR subgroup, 24-week ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates seem to be apparently lower in the mavrilimumab-treated patients compared with golimumab (53.8%, 35.9%, and 10.3% vs 69.4%, 44.4%, and 27.8%, respectively) 62. However, the authors argued that the dose adopted in this study might be suboptimal as compared to the one (150 mg eow) predicted as most effective by the previously described exposure–response relationship simulation58 and subsequently confirmed by the results of EARTH EXPLORER 1 study 61. This argument is reasonable because ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates in the 150 mg group of EARTH EXPLORER 1 study seem to be higher (73.4%, 40.5%, and 13.9%, respectively) compared with the 100 mg group of EARTH EXPLORER 2 study (53.8%, 35.9%, and 10.3%, respectively) and comparable with the golimumab group of EARTH EXPLORER 2 study (69.4%, 44.4%, and 27.8%, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the study was not powered to demonstrate statistical significance between mavrilimumab and golimumab, in sDMARD-IR subgroup, 24-week ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates seem to be apparently lower in the mavrilimumab-treated patients compared with golimumab (53.8%, 35.9%, and 10.3% vs 69.4%, 44.4%, and 27.8%, respectively) 62. However, the authors argued that the dose adopted in this study might be suboptimal as compared to the one (150 mg eow) predicted as most effective by the previously described exposure–response relationship simulation58 and subsequently confirmed by the results of EARTH EXPLORER 1 study 61. This argument is reasonable because ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates in the 150 mg group of EARTH EXPLORER 1 study seem to be higher (73.4%, 40.5%, and 13.9%, respectively) compared with the 100 mg group of EARTH EXPLORER 2 study (53.8%, 35.9%, and 10.3%, respectively) and comparable with the golimumab group of EARTH EXPLORER 2 study (69.4%, 44.4%, and 27.8%, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This explorative analysis indicated a priori that the maximum efficacy may be reached at the 150 mg eow dosage, although this mavrilimumab regimen was not evaluated in EARTH studies 58. According to these findings, in the subsequent 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb EARTH EXPLORER 1 trial, 326 sDMARD-insufficient responder RA patients were randomized to receive three different mavrilimumab eow doses including 150 mg (30 mg, n=81; 100 mg, n=85; or 150 mg, n=79) or placebo (n=81) in association with MTX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of phase IIb study (EARTH EXPLORER 1) were presented recently as abstracts [46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in moderate to severe (DAS28-CRP ≥3.2; ≥4 swollen joint) RA patients with an inadequate response to ≥1 DMARDs.…”
Section: Gm-csfr Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%