1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.10508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio total-energy calculations for iron-acceptor pairs in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,25 Local-density-functional spin-polarized ͑LSDA͒ Green's function calculations [28][29][30] and recently fully relaxed generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ calculations 18,31 were used to model the electronic structure of interstitial iron, reproducing the observed spin-1 and spin-3/2 for Fe i and Fe i + , respectively, and finding a donor level in the lower half of the band gap in agreement with experiment. Iron-acceptor pairing was also the object of previous theoretical studies, [16][17][18] which found that the C 3v configuration is the most stable for Fe i B but a C 2v configuration, where Fe i is at the second-nearest T site of the substitutional acceptor atom, is almost degenerate in energy with the trigonal form for Fe i Al and Fe i Ga, and energetically favorable for the larger acceptors In and Tl. 17,18 Both the orthorhombic and trigonal forms of each pair were found to exist in three charge states ͑−, 0, and +͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,25 Local-density-functional spin-polarized ͑LSDA͒ Green's function calculations [28][29][30] and recently fully relaxed generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ calculations 18,31 were used to model the electronic structure of interstitial iron, reproducing the observed spin-1 and spin-3/2 for Fe i and Fe i + , respectively, and finding a donor level in the lower half of the band gap in agreement with experiment. Iron-acceptor pairing was also the object of previous theoretical studies, [16][17][18] which found that the C 3v configuration is the most stable for Fe i B but a C 2v configuration, where Fe i is at the second-nearest T site of the substitutional acceptor atom, is almost degenerate in energy with the trigonal form for Fe i Al and Fe i Ga, and energetically favorable for the larger acceptors In and Tl. 17,18 Both the orthorhombic and trigonal forms of each pair were found to exist in three charge states ͑−, 0, and +͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2 The formation of iron-acceptor pairs at temperatures below 80-100°C is accompanied by a decrease in the concentration of isolated Fe i , and they remain stable up to a higher temperature stage ͑100-200°C͒ when a recovery of the concentration of isolated Fe i is observed. 2 The Fe i B complex, formed by an interstitial iron close to a substitutional boron aligned along the ͗111͘ crystallographic direction, [16][17][18] has a well-known donor level at about E v + 0.1 eV. This electrical level arises from the Fe i +/+2 transition level, pulled into the band gap due to the electrostatic interaction with B − .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,67 In situations were the impurity can be assume to reside at undistorted high-symmetry sites-as is the case here ͑see below͒-these calculations are better suited than our pseudopotential method to reproduce the EPR and ENDOR data. We do not focus on this aspect of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Based on these EPR observations most theoretical approaches focused on iron on ideal tetrahedral interstitial sites ͑see Refs. 10-14 and references therein͒, but, with the exception of Feacceptor pairs, 15 never in a configuration of symmetry lower than T d .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%