2014
DOI: 10.2138/am.2014.4833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of sapphirine end-members in the join Mg4Al8Si2O20-Mg3Al10SiO20

Abstract: Using the hybrid B3LYP density functional method, we computed the ab initio thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of two sapphirine end-members, Mg 4 Al 8 Si 2 O 20 (sapphirine-442) and Mg 3 Al 10 SiO 20 (sapphirine-351), in the join Mg 3 (Mg 1-X Al X )Al 8 (Al X Si 1-X )SiO 20 with X = 0-1. Static and vibrational calculations performed in the framework of the quasi-harmonic approximation allowed to define the equation of state (EOS), elastic constant tensor, seismic velocities, IR spectra, mode Grüneise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Fe, the basis set of Valerio et al (1995) was adopted, corresponding to an 86-41G * contraction scheme. A variational re-optimisation of the exponents of the most diffuse Gaussian functions of all three elements was also tested in pe and pvk, with no significant enhancement compared to the original values (see Belmonte et al, 2013Belmonte et al, , 2014 regarding the use of optimised basis sets compared to those in the present work). Further calculations were carried out by semi-empirical potentials and lattice dynamics using the GULP code, in order to estimate the effect of the vibration contribution on DG 0 (P,T,x), as stated in the previous section.…”
Section: Computingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of Fe, the basis set of Valerio et al (1995) was adopted, corresponding to an 86-41G * contraction scheme. A variational re-optimisation of the exponents of the most diffuse Gaussian functions of all three elements was also tested in pe and pvk, with no significant enhancement compared to the original values (see Belmonte et al, 2013Belmonte et al, , 2014 regarding the use of optimised basis sets compared to those in the present work). Further calculations were carried out by semi-empirical potentials and lattice dynamics using the GULP code, in order to estimate the effect of the vibration contribution on DG 0 (P,T,x), as stated in the previous section.…”
Section: Computingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Calculations for the energy response for different phases of crystal structures except sapphirine crystals were performed using the Quantum Espresso package . For the calculation of EOS for the sapphirine system, the CRYSTAL package was applied. …”
Section: Reaxff and Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 8-511G basis set adopted for Na returns at the DFT/B3LYP theory level an electronic energy of E 0 = −162.023898 hartree, which is intermediate between the B3LYP/STO-3G low limit of −160.082859 hartree and the B3LYP/Aug-cc-pVQZ value of −162.298993 hartree. Adopting optimized electronic energies for Si and O, 35 the electronic energy of Na returning the experimental value of H f 0 is E 0 = −162.224203 hartree (Table 5). This computation gives the correct dissociation energy of the substance (Table 6) if one assumes that the basis set superposition error (BSSE) is negligible.…”
Section: Thermochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%