The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio study on plane defects in zirconium–hydrogen solid solution and zirconium hydride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
52
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
25
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for the sake of comparison. It can be observed that for pure Zr the present DE values of the FCC and BCC structures as a reference of the HCP structure are 38 and 75 meV/atom, respectively, which agrees well with the corresponding calculated values of 40 and 78 meV/atom [12]. One could also notice from It is of importance to reveal the intrinsic mechanism of the effect of H on structural stability of Zr, and the electronic structures of various ZrH x phases are therefore calculated in the present study.…”
Section: Calculation Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…3 for the sake of comparison. It can be observed that for pure Zr the present DE values of the FCC and BCC structures as a reference of the HCP structure are 38 and 75 meV/atom, respectively, which agrees well with the corresponding calculated values of 40 and 78 meV/atom [12]. One could also notice from It is of importance to reveal the intrinsic mechanism of the effect of H on structural stability of Zr, and the electronic structures of various ZrH x phases are therefore calculated in the present study.…”
Section: Calculation Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This contrasts greatly with Zhu et al 16 , who claimed that the δ-hydride is by far the most stable hydride, by nearly 8 eV more than the other phases. It is, however, difficult to understand that result, since the "convex hull" presented was not actually convex, and the magnitude of this number is out of line with other results 15,26,40,43 .…”
Section: Enthalpiesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…When comparing verious groups' results it is worth noticing that (a) Zr is notoriusly difficult to model and (b) all of the above cited works, except the last one, use a pseudo potential approach, which is generally considered less accurate than projector based and all-electron methods, such as PAW, FP-LAPW and FP-LMTO. In a recent paper Udagawa et al even presented an analysis of plane defect in Zr-H systems by computing γ-surfaces and surface energy in these systems using DFT-methods [13]. There still exists some gaps and some cases where published elastic coefficients do not match from one group to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%