We report a study of the unimolecular dissociation of BrCH 2 CH 2 O radicals produced from the photodissociation of BrCH 2 CH 2 ONO at 351/355 nm. Using both a crossed laser-molecular beam scattering apparatus with electron bombardment detection and a velocity map imaging apparatus with tunable VUV photoionization detection, we investigate the initial photodissociation channels of the BrCH 2 CH 2 ONO precursor and the subsequent dissociation of the vibrationally excited BrCH 2 CH 2 O radicals. The only photodissociation channel of the precursor we detected upon photodissociation at 351 nm was O−NO bond fission. C−Br photofission and HBr photoelimination do not compete significantly with O−NO photofission at this excitation wavelength. The measured O−NO photofission recoil kinetic energy distribution peaks near 14 kcal/mol and extends from 5 to 24 kcal/mol. There is also a small signal from lower kinetic energy NO product (it would be 6% of the total if it were also from O−NO photofission). We use the O−NO photofission P(E T ) peaking near 14 kcal/mol to help characterize the internal energy distribution in the nascent ground electronic state BrCH 2 CH 2 O radicals. At 351 nm, some but not all of the BrCH 2 CH 2 O radicals are formed with enough internal energy to unimolecularly dissociate to CH 2 Br + H 2 CO. Although the signal at m/e = 93 (CH 2 Br + ) obtained with electron bombardment detection includes signal both from the CH 2 Br product and from dissociative ionization of the energetically stable BrCH 2 CH 2 O radicals, we were able to isolate the signal from CH 2 Br product alone using tunable VUV photoionization detection at 8.78 eV. We also sought to investigate the source of vinoxy radicals detected in spectroscopic experiments by Miller and co-workers (J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 12032) from the photodissociation of BrCH 2 CH 2 ONO at 351 nm. Using velocity map imaging and photodissociating the precursor at 355 nm, we detected a tiny signal at m/e = 43 and a larger signal at m/e = 15 that we tentatively assign to vinoxy. An underlying signal in the time-of-flight spectra at m/e = 29 and m/e = 42, the two strongest peaks in the literature electron bombardment mass spectrum of vinoxy, is also apparent. Comparison of those signal strengths with the signal at HBr + , however, shows that the vinoxy product does not have HBr as a cofragment, so the prior suggestion by Miller and co-workers that the vinoxy might result from a roaming mechanism is contraindicated.