2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio resolution measurement for single particle structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rmeasure was even less reliable as it tends to fail with low resolution structures (Sousa and Grigorieff, 2007). We saw a sharp break in the distribution of resolutions we obtained for the initial models with Rmeasure, with about half of our reconstructions in the 35Å to 47Å range and the rest all giving a resolution of 90Å (data not shown).…”
Section: How Do We Select the Best Initial Models From A Large Set Ofmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rmeasure was even less reliable as it tends to fail with low resolution structures (Sousa and Grigorieff, 2007). We saw a sharp break in the distribution of resolutions we obtained for the initial models with Rmeasure, with about half of our reconstructions in the 35Å to 47Å range and the rest all giving a resolution of 90Å (data not shown).…”
Section: How Do We Select the Best Initial Models From A Large Set Ofmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We tested both the Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) (Harauz and van Heel, 1986) and Rmeasure (Sousa and Grigorieff, 2007). Unfortunately, while a few of the "good" volumes shown in Figure 2A had relatively good resolutions by the 0.5 FSC criterion, others ranked near the bottom of our 101 initial volumes.…”
Section: How Do We Select the Best Initial Models From A Large Set Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These particles were then subjected to 10 subsequent rounds of refinement while enforcing either C1 or I1 symmetry, and while dividing the particles into two equal halves. The resulting 3D structures were resolved to ∼15 Å as independently verified using the RMEASURE program [12]. Overall parameters for the global reconstruction routines included a pixel size of 5 Å, a reference model low-pass filtered to 50 Å, and a regularization parameter of T=4 over an angular search space of 7.5 degrees.…”
Section: Image Processing and 3d Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM reconstructions were calculated for each type of specimen and included 572 particles for images of DLPs over holes ( Figure 3E) and 38 particles for images of DLPs on cryo-SiN (Figure 3F). Using the RMEASURE program [16] the reconstruction calculated for DLPs in holes was approximately 2.4 nm while the reconstruction calculated for DLPs on cryo-SiN was estimated to be 2.5 nm. As a control, we selected 40 random particles from specimens prepared on holey carbon film and used the same computing parameters.…”
Section: D Reconstructions Reveal Conserved Capsids With Variable Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%