2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/35/5/316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio R-matrix/multichannel quantum defect theory study of nitric oxide

Abstract: Ab initio R-matrix techniques are combined with multi-channel quantum defect theory to determine the properties of arbitrarily highly excited electronic states of nitric oxide. Results are obtained for l = 0-4 channels associated with the four lowest NO+ target channels, namely 1Σ+, 3Σ+, 3Π and 3Δ. Energy and bond length variations of the quantum defect functions for all target states are reported. Certain small surface amplitude R-matrix poles also serve to determine the energies of valence states. Diabatic p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of other information, this latter term was taken as G 12 (0, 0) = G + (000)−ω with a width at half height of 6700 cm −1 , which may be compared with the experimental values of 60500 cm −1 and 7200cm −1 [30]. The width is therefore well reproduced and the main contribution to the discrepancy in the peak positions probably arises from the assumption of an energy independent quantum defect function, because ab initio estimates [31] of the vertical excitation energies between the 3s and 4s potential surfaces indicates a decrease in the quantum defect from µ = 1.31 to 1.21, which is well in line with a calculated jump in the s quantum defect of NO by 0.1 units, attributable to core polarization effects at energies where the d channels open, an effect that is very well established for NO [32,33]. The variations between the predissociation linewidths in Table 2 are the main focus of the paper.…”
Section: Mqdt Non-adiabatic Coupling Theorysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the absence of other information, this latter term was taken as G 12 (0, 0) = G + (000)−ω with a width at half height of 6700 cm −1 , which may be compared with the experimental values of 60500 cm −1 and 7200cm −1 [30]. The width is therefore well reproduced and the main contribution to the discrepancy in the peak positions probably arises from the assumption of an energy independent quantum defect function, because ab initio estimates [31] of the vertical excitation energies between the 3s and 4s potential surfaces indicates a decrease in the quantum defect from µ = 1.31 to 1.21, which is well in line with a calculated jump in the s quantum defect of NO by 0.1 units, attributable to core polarization effects at energies where the d channels open, an effect that is very well established for NO [32,33]. The variations between the predissociation linewidths in Table 2 are the main focus of the paper.…”
Section: Mqdt Non-adiabatic Coupling Theorysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The complete interpretation of the experimental data in Figure 8 requires the combination of multichannel quantum defect theory 29,66,67 or matrix diagonalization methods 26,27,29,30,68 , and a numerical treatment of the timeevolution of the excited state population in the stray electric fields, and 300 K blackbody radiation field in the apparatus 12,14 . However, to highlight the primary role played by near degeneracies between np(0) and nf(2) Rydberg states, which are accessible by electric dipole transitions from the A 2 Σ + intermediate state, and high-hydrogenic states in the work reported here, we consider a simple numerical model in which seven Rydberg series are included.…”
Section: Numerical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marked result from figure 7(a) with the notation (J + 1/2) + for = 3/2 and (J + 1/2) − for = 1/2. help of the MQDO method and using the known quantum defects η λ [48,54], formula (15) predicts β 2 = 0.88 for the ionization of the 4dδN 2 (v = 0) state. This is in good agreement with our experimentally determined value of 0.95 ± 0.1.…”
Section: F1-valence-rydberg Oscillationmentioning
confidence: 99%