2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2<186::aid-prot1030>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio protein structure prediction using physicochemical potentials and a simplified off-lattice model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using constraints derived from NMR, we modeled the structure of the complex between PrP and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model, produced using the NMR intensity data displayed on the PrP backbone, was refined using in-house docking software (BUDE) (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using constraints derived from NMR, we modeled the structure of the complex between PrP and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model, produced using the NMR intensity data displayed on the PrP backbone, was refined using in-house docking software (BUDE) (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR structure (1QLX) of residues 23-230 of the human prion protein was used for modeling the interaction between PrP c and Fe(III)-TMPyP. The initial model was refined using in-house docking software (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme-The possible conformations available to the unrestrained N-terminal extension of L1 (as would be likely to exist in the monomer) were computed using the ab-initio evolutionary Monte Carlo technique of Gibbs et al (40). For the first 19 N-terminal amino acids, an initial set of structures was generated with backbone -geometries applied randomly.…”
Section: Modeling Of the N-terminal Extension In The Monomermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For very simple discrete models, all conformations could be enumerated [20,76,96,141,[255][256][257][258][259][260] and an exact analysis of the model thermodynamics performed [20,261]. Structure and thermodynamics of more complex models are studied via classical molecular dynamics [262 -267] (MD), Monte Carlo (MC) methods [26,109,129,158 -160,167,168, 237,239,268-274], genetic algorithms and hybrid combinations of these methods [275]. The dynamics of continuous reduced models could be studied via classical MD [36,201, 204,265 -267,276,277] or its variants [263] (for instance, Brownian dynamics [265,278]), but also via various MC schemes [209,210] or combinations of various methods of global minimization [275].…”
Section: Sampling Conformational Space Of Reduced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure and thermodynamics of more complex models are studied via classical molecular dynamics [262 -267] (MD), Monte Carlo (MC) methods [26,109,129,158 -160,167,168, 237,239,268-274], genetic algorithms and hybrid combinations of these methods [275]. The dynamics of continuous reduced models could be studied via classical MD [36,201, 204,265 -267,276,277] or its variants [263] (for instance, Brownian dynamics [265,278]), but also via various MC schemes [209,210] or combinations of various methods of global minimization [275]. Long time dynamics of discrete models could be studied using Monte Carlo dynamics (MCD) schemes [22,60,69,146,163,166,[172][173][174][175]233,268,279].…”
Section: Sampling Conformational Space Of Reduced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%