2011
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab Initio Multireference Investigation of Disjoint Diradicals: Singlet versus Triplet Ground States

Abstract: We present improved virtual orbital (IVO) complete active space (CAS) configuration interaction (IVO-CASCI) and IVO-CASCI-based multireference Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MRMPPT) calculations with an aim to elucidate the electronic structure of tetramethyleneethane (TME) in its lowest singlet and triplet state and to quantify their order and extent of splitting. The potential surfaces of singlet and triplet states for the twisting of TME are also studied. We found that the triplet state is higher in en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VMC calculations based on CASSCF(6,6)/cc‐pVTZ geometries for twisting potential delineated a possible near‐degeneracy between the singlet and triplet states that disappeared at the DMC level of calculation (using a truncated cc‐pV5Z basis coupled with a pseudopotential to create a torsional potential), yielding a small gap between the states with the singlet 1 A state lower in energy at all torsional angles . Note that our previous IVO‐MRPT2 calculations explicitly revealed 1 [TME] to be more stable than 3 [TME] and gave the 90° twisted structure as the minimum of the singlet state . There is no tiny hump on the computed torsion surface for the single state, however, the minimum in the TPS of 3 [TME] occurs at a twisted angle near 45° .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VMC calculations based on CASSCF(6,6)/cc‐pVTZ geometries for twisting potential delineated a possible near‐degeneracy between the singlet and triplet states that disappeared at the DMC level of calculation (using a truncated cc‐pV5Z basis coupled with a pseudopotential to create a torsional potential), yielding a small gap between the states with the singlet 1 A state lower in energy at all torsional angles . Note that our previous IVO‐MRPT2 calculations explicitly revealed 1 [TME] to be more stable than 3 [TME] and gave the 90° twisted structure as the minimum of the singlet state . There is no tiny hump on the computed torsion surface for the single state, however, the minimum in the TPS of 3 [TME] occurs at a twisted angle near 45° .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that our previous IVO‐MRPT2 calculations explicitly revealed 1 [TME] to be more stable than 3 [TME] and gave the 90° twisted structure as the minimum of the singlet state . There is no tiny hump on the computed torsion surface for the single state, however, the minimum in the TPS of 3 [TME] occurs at a twisted angle near 45° . Although MRCCSD(T)/cc‐pVTZ with CASSCF(2,2) orbitals calculations provide very flat potential energy surface for 1 [TME], one tiny minimum is found nearly at 30 ° and two maxima are clearly visible at 0° and 90° in the 1 [TME].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our results have been compared with state-of-the-art results and experimental data, if available. The IVO-CASCI has already been used in the past to study radicaloids52,53 . It should be noted that the prime aim of the work is not to answer the still open questions of interpretation of electronic structure of the systems investigated but rather to judge the efficacy of the newly developed IVO-SSMRPT to provide a viable means of calculation of singlet and non-singlet states of radicals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is in accord with the estimations of high‐level quantum chemical methods. Investigations by our group indicate that the geometrical parameters provided by SSMRPT calculations are in well agreement with the IVO‐MRMP method. The SSMRPT geometries for TDB are also in acceptable agreement with the spin‐adapted CCSD(T) [RCCSD(T)] (see Figures 3 and 4 in Ref ).…”
Section: Selected Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For these systems, CAS(2,2) is used as references wave function in the calculations of SSMRPT method. Details of the SSMRPT calculations have been given in Refs .…”
Section: Selected Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%